MohaBeer (202) - Lima, PERU - AUG 18, 2015
3.8 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
Ambar con claridad, buena espuma y adherencia. Lúpulo cítrico y malta en aroma en balance. Tibieza alcohólica, balance en boca al lúpulo sin ser amargo invasivo ni astringente, buena carbonatación, con cuerpo. Final lupulado, de las mejores cervezas mexicanas industriales y buena representante del estilo Pale Lager.
angel77 (2418) - oviedo, SPAIN - AUG 15, 2015
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 8/20
Botella 33 cl de hipercor Oviedo Tomada en 2002. Sin Lote hasta 04-12-2002 (grabado en Botella) otra cosa ligera suave y con mínimo sabor de Méjico que se bebe sin ninguna dificultad. De lo más corriente
TorbenJensen (1457) - Valby, DENMARK - AUG 14, 2015
0.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
This Mexican beer is sold in a small plump bottle which I actually think is a nice shape, nice label and a dainty gold collar.
Unfortunately foaming is not available and the smell is very limited, smells only of little citrus and hops. The taste is initially marked by citrus and in the beginning it taste really quite good. Later, the taste is a little watery with hop flavor. It has virtually no fullness and no special traits. I can not think of anything as it could be recommended for. Boring, boring, boring. Unfortunately!
KoRoBeNiKi (144) - Fair Lawn, New Jersey, USA - JUL 29, 2015
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 3/20
Very sweet and hoppy aroma. Yellow color with some light brown tinge possibly due to malt. Not enough hops but the sweetness is not overpowering, probably since it’s not super strong.
Slightly better than the other beers by Cuauhtémoc-Moctezuma. Better than Corona but then again that is Corona. Worse than Modela Negro.
chinchill (4267) - South Carolina, USA - JUL 27, 2015
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
UPDATED: OCT 5, 2015 12 oz fancy botlle.
Not fancy beer. Instead, what we have here is a below average pilsner style beer with mild aroma and flavor.
Certainly more interesting and flavorful than, say, Corona Light, but the blend of earthy hops, light malts (and corn?), is not the best combo.
Medium-light body with medium carbonation.
Ferris (12682) - Burnaby, British Columbia, CANADA - JUL 21, 2015
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
Bottle - Light grains and a touch of skunk. Clear gold with a decent white head. Some citrus orange peel notes and a light bitterness. Not bad.
colui72 (661) - HONG KONG - JUL 16, 2015
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
This simple lager is surprisingly good in a market that has demoted pale lager to Z division beers. Nice golden pour with medium white head. Hoppy aroma and taste is rich and crisp with a full hoppy ending. Nice.
GreatDane1632 (1168) - North Dakota, USA - JUL 3, 2015
3.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
Rated based on notes taken 21 June 2012 -- This is pretty decent for a darker cerveza.
Shanebrews (284) - Virginia, USA - JUN 29, 2015
4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
Who knew Mexicans were brewing a Pilsner this good? This pours straw colored with medium carbonation and a thin white head. The nose is equal parts light grassy malt and aroma hops. The body is light and crisp with a refreshing bite of hops on the end. Overall, I doubt the average drinker could distinguish this from Staropramen, it is that similar to the lighter Czech pilsners.
ttoadee (1286) - Austin, Texas, USA - JUN 27, 2015
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Gold pour, quick head. Nose is light kilned grain. Middle is more sweet malt, brief hop assertiveness. Finish merges back to sweetish. OK.