MrRomero (1973) - Nolanville, USA - AUG 17, 2005
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Bottle: aroma-less and pale yellow with a big white head. For all the head, this was mildly carbonated. Reminded me of a typical brewpub blonde which is not to say itís bad, just boring. Light hairspray tasting and light overall. Mild apple. Really not bad and worth a shot over a Bud or Miller.
SuIIy (1984) - Burlington, Vermont, USA - MAR 1, 2005
2.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 10/20
like the previous rater, I got this beer in florida but it comes from wisconsin ( which seems to be the king of america when it comes to shit beer) this wasnt bad. it had an average dark yellow color but had a nice lager bite, similar to a fosters. not bad, definately not good though
kyzr (1143) - Belgrade, Montana, USA - OCT 21, 2005
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Very light yellow with small white head. Flavor is super sweet, like a bud with more sugar added. Finish is a little tart.
Sham (1845) - Seattle, Washington, USA - NOV 5, 2005
2.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Clear gold with light head. Sour malt aroma. Almost a wet towel smell. Iím not sure what I mean by that, but it just reminds me of such. Flavor is very light. A little touch of apples and malts. Not too much else. It does not however, taste like bootie.
ghawener (1428) - San Salvador, EL SALVADOR - JUL 27, 2005
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Can: Bright golden, pours a medium bright head that quickly fades. Taste is crisp, nice hops and malt balance, herbal, notes of spices. Grab yourself some Bootie.
openwindow (67) - Manchester, New Hampshire, USA - MAR 14, 2005
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Found in a bottle in FL. Nothing special, not overly horrible. TChromeís review states "remarkable for not being remarkable". I donít think that could be stated any better.
dp (607) - uniontown, Ohio, USA - JUL 2, 2005
1.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Purchased this for the name, and the price wasnít bad. Too bad the taste lived up to the price. Donít think Iíll try this one again.
BŁckDich (5464) - McCall, Idaho, USA - NOV 8, 2005
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Clear gold with no head. A funky corn, rice or other adjunct nose with musky hop. Light flavor with a watery tail, sweet but unbalanced with underwhelming bitterness. The finish is pale, light, watery, boring. Meh.
hopscotch (8367) - Vero Beach, Florida, USA - APR 3, 2007
1.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Bottle... AWOL í07... Clear yellow lager with a tiny, fizzy, white head. Subtle, peppery, yeasty nose. The flavor leans on the sweet side of balance, but not by much. Itís bland and barely medium-bodied with fizzy carbonation. However, itís fairly refreshing and I suppose thatís its goal. Short, crisp, lightly sweet finish.
Lumpy (1802) - Carrollton, Texas, USA - FEB 26, 2005
1.7 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bottle. Smells just like burned plastic. Body is straw with a ring of bubbles. Tastes like the usual macro with a burnt plastic taste. The finish leaves a taste like acrid smoke. That is going to cost some points. Thanks to Nuffield for sharing this farce of a beer.