dmschefke (571) - Macomb, Michigan, USA - AUG 21, 2009
3.4 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Pours a slightly amber orange with medium white head. Aroma mostly citrus hops, slight malt, and a bit of pine. Flavor matches well and makes for a nice refreshing pale ale.
anders37 (19376) - Malmö, SWEDEN - JUL 2, 2015
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Bottle. Pours a slightly hazy golden pale amber color with a small off-white head. Has a fruity malty weak hoppy citrus aroma. Fruity malty weak citrus hoppy flavor. Has a fruity malty citrus hoppy finish.
SG111 (574) - New York, USA - JUN 30, 2015
3.3 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Canned. Best by 08/05/15. Pour into a tulip. Pours very deep amber color with a sizeable beige head. Aroma is very floral, with pine and citrus notes. Distinct maltiness. Flavor is super malty. Some hoppy floral notes bit overall very malty. Not much bitterness to it. Which is expected based on the can saying outright that it has hop character without bitterness. Not bad. Not amazing.
nealblind (1108) - Seattle, Alabama, USA - JUN 29, 2015
3 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
with orange pour and minimal hops, this is an amber.
Smells like an amber alt beer, tobacco, caramel earth. tastes fine, husky grain, hops are orangey/whatever. This shouldn’t be called hoppy or session. Drinks almost like a brown. Horrible marketing aside, it’s a fine beer.
Ctplt777 (326) - - JUN 25, 2015
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 5/20
Not has hoppy as I was expecting. Theres a really sweet sort of syrupy aroma. I didn’t really ever get a lot of hoppyness just a lot of sweetness. Taste is quite a bit better but still lacks "hoppy" I was excited for. It’s not bad but I always get pumped about hoppy shit and when I get a dud it kind of sucks.
Errl (2115) - Plano, Texas, USA - JUN 24, 2015
3.6 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
Tap..Pour is dark gold with a nice white head..Nose is spicy hops, sweetness, juicy friut, soft .Taste is light hop spice, fruits, light caramel, floral, soft sweetness
AndySnow (4829) - Stockholm, SWEDEN - JUN 10, 2015
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
How: Bottle, as Hazed and Infused.
Where: The Bishops Arms Marina Plaza, Helsingborg.
Appearance: Hazy amber colour with an off-white head.
Aroma: Hops, fruit, grapefruit.
Body: Medium body and carbonation.
Flavour: Tropical fruit, grapefruit, hops, some malt.
Hopmaestro (481) - Örebro, SWEDEN - MAY 18, 2015
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Aroma is wet hops and wet grass. Caramel aura. Taste is rather malty for being a session brew, and it’s almost spicy in the aftertaste, I get some kind of nutty taste? Not the kind of stuff I was expecting but overall a decent brew.
DedicatedToFun (3935) - Santa Monica, California, USA - APR 26, 2015
3.3 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Bottle, amber pour, white head, nose is caramel, taste is sweet, nutty, hops, citrus
Jabah (205) - Winter Park, Florida, USA - APR 10, 2015
3.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
This was the 2nd brand of dry hopped pale ale that I tried, the first being the dry-hopped red ale by Rogue. This is a thinner color, slightly amber with a hint of red/orange. It is pretty hoppy, but not as heavy as some other dry hopped or super hoppy beers I tried. There is a good balance of sweetness from the malts and a good piney taste. I will buy again I’m sure, but keep passing it up for something new. Another good brew by Boulder Brewing Co. I am "hopping" on the bandwagon.
TXBadger (1924) - Dallas, Texas, USA - MAR 22, 2015
3.6 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
Pours an orangish amber color with off-white head. Light pine, citrus, and some malt on the nose; follows onto the palate. Finishes with a nice balance between the resinous hop flavors and the malts.