Bygers (584) - Oslo, NORWAY - AUG 30, 2013
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Tap 0,25l. Pours a pale golden colour, almost no head. No aroma. Not much taste.
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
fiulijn (13533) - Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - DEC 17, 2003
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Blond hazy color. Light malt aroma. Sweeter than other Boxer's, but with less interest; and the usual quite bitter final.
krisbierjaeger (844) - dolores, Colorado, USA - OCT 9, 2002
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
light legal-pad yellow. head is as stout as wet toilet paper, functioning only in the context of a brisk pour. aroma is virtually an empty canvas: the artist had very little to say: a suggestion of straw here, a wispy outline where a breadstick could appear there. likewise the flavor is streamlined to roll over the tongue making almost no impression: a stealth beer. the fact that it is packaged with a steel and porcelaine latch top is a hilarious incongruity: for this featherweight lager to bear such a formidable archival quality closure is like an iron manhole cover where seran wrap would suffice. simulataneously inoffensive and utterly uninteresting.
Bov (9050) - Bienne, SWITZERLAND - MAY 27, 2002
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
pale golden colour, almost no head, fresh, no aroma, desperately neutral, a touch of paperboard in the finish makes sure my senses are not dead ...
HansJM (358) - NORWAY - NOV 30, 2001
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 10/20
Tested back in 97...A strange start, but an excellent finish. A little watery in the middle.