on tap

Local Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 26   MEAN: 1.41/5.0   WEIGHTED AVG: 1.65/5   EST. CALORIES: 165   ABV: 5.5%
Boxer Premium Ice Beer.

   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 8/20
Strangebrewer (1180) - Chatham, Ontario, CANADA - AUG 28, 2016
can. Poured clear yellow with a scant white head. Sweet grainy aroma. Light body, high carbonation, prickly mouthfeel. Corn grain generic flavour, sweetish with a slightly peppery note.

   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
ffbot (355) - Oakland, California, USA - NOV 9, 2015
Pour is dark yellow, a lightning fast head and light carbonation. smell is barely there: sweet abstract corn and funky earth? Taste is barely there, again abstract sweetness, sweetened palate that fades quicker than the head. This doesnít taste like anything!

   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
heemer77 (5297) - Urbandale, Iowa, USA - JUL 10, 2015
Can. Medium gold colored body with a barely perceptible white head. Nose is super sweet white cake like with hints of corn. This tastes like over sugared corn flakes with a green apple finish. It is a little bit metallic and just disgustingly sweet. The only difference between this and a malt liquor is the lack of a boozy bite. Bleh, this is horrendous.

   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 5/20
Bricks (991) - Delaware, USA - JAN 8, 2014
UPDATED: FEB 16, 2014 $11.99 for 36. Fairly typical swill appearance. Smells of sweetness, metallic notes and corn. Tastes sweet... like racing fuel bubble gum additive smells and mouthfeel is surprisingly harsh, but not overly so. Effectively, it is the epitome of ice beer.

   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 12/20
Sickboy92 (2) - Midwest City, Oklahoma, USA - DEC 10, 2013 does not count
This was my first ice beer. I canít say too much about it. It was drinkable, it really was. It doesnít come close to most, but on a budget itís the best youíll come by. Itís pretty much a typical beer. Very hard to find in the bible belt.

   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
Patrickctenchi (6094) - Coxís Knob, columbus, Indiana, USA - JUL 8, 2013
24 oz. can: Slightly hazed gold with a frothy, off-white head. Lemony-sweet grain malt aroma. Ridiculously sweet flavor. Sugary, corny, grain malt, aluminum. Awful.... and OH! Look! Minhas had a hand in this....what a surprise... Just bad, bad, bad... I hope my $1.38 for this enables them to buy a helpful brewerís guide or a can of neon spray paint to tag, "CLOSED" on the side of their building..... Sorry, thatís harsh...but damn.....their stuff is terrible.

   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 8/20
orofi001 (4) - CANADA - MAY 10, 2013 does not count
Boxer ice is drastically better than boxer lager, and it is not a bad beer for the price.

   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 6/20
Metalchopz (3095) - Cantley, Quebec, CANADA - APR 25, 2013
Second cheap Ice beer today in cans (the other being the Keystone Ice). Pours a little more golden than the other. Head is way better as well - way more retention and some lacing everywhere. Aromas of malts, adjuncts and hints of honey. Again, better scent, but where this one goes wrong is the taste. Sweet malty mouth with some more adjuncts and then, the same club soda feel. So, a better looking beer, but the taste kind of does not sit well in the stomach. The Keystone is easier going down.

   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 2/20
gilvanblight (821) - Windsor, Ontario, CANADA - JAN 25, 2013
Very clear coppery pour with quite a bit of clingy lacy head. Scent is not good. It smells like stale beer. Like walking into a bar near the university that obviously hasnít been cleaned nearly enough. No seriously this is not a good smell. This is what your pants smell like the morning after a night with much spillage. Itís the smell you hope isnít on you when you are driving home after having more than you should. Yeah this is off to a good start. The taste is better than that scent. Well I think so. This doesnít really have a taste. Itís all aftertaste. Going down itís wet. Then you get hit by an aftertaste of sweet malts, a touch of caramel. But not that good, hey my porter has a nice sweet tone to it, but in the why does this beer suddenly have a sweet aftertaste kind of way. Yeah, good beer this is not. Iím amazed this has only like 6 ratings and I have to assume this is due to the face some people follow the "if you canít say anything nice" rule still.

   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
chirality (2) - - NOV 8, 2012 does not count
This beer is disgusting. The worst beer Iíve ever had yuck. If you have to drink this donít

We Want To Hear From You

Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »

Page    1  2 3

Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Copyright © 2000-2016,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
about us
About RateBeer
New Beers
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50