3fourths (7772) - Boulder, Colorado, USA - JAN 12, 2003
2.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
UPDATED: JUL 3, 2007 [rerate needed] Not a good experience with this beer. Tasted almost rancid, and quite sour. Watery, and played bad on my tongue. Probably the worst "micro" found in Colorado.
PBOYNY (316) - Westchester, New York, USA - JAN 2, 2003
1.9 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
i remember when this beer actually was good, what the hell happened to it, an annoying chemical taste and weak, over-carbonated nasty brew that tastes like it was brewed with plasma .
thefatguy (34) - Calgary, Alberta, CANADA - DEC 19, 2002
3.4 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Good, Not the best amber ale Iíve had, but suitable for myself. Somewhat strong aftertaste. Nice Label.
cb (810) - Roeland Park, Kansas, USA - DEC 10, 2002
1.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Boring and way too "subtle". It really didnít taste like anything to me.
grant (842) - Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA - DEC 10, 2002
1.6 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
I swear that this stuff smells like some kind of hair care product; a perm perhaps? Really sweet with a smoky (cigarette smoke, that is) wisp in there somewhere. Hugely metallic edge pervades the whole beer. Boring, shoddy, and watery.
JCW (1274) - Cincinnati, Ohio, USA - NOV 14, 2002
2.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 10/20
UPDATED: FEB 2, 2003 Beautiful reddish amber in color. Not much of an aroma. I can't taste the hops at all. This beer is very sweet. I can't even taste the carmel in the malt. The finish is also sweet.
hopscotch (8460) - Vero Beach, Florida, USA - NOV 7, 2002
3.8 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
This beer rocks. I see itís not a favorite among the others who have rated it. The commercial description will have to suffice since I took no notes while drinking this beer. However, if you enjoy other Amber Ales that I have rated highly, I see no reason why you wouldnít enjoy this malty beer as well.
Slick (1969) - Thief River Falls, Minnesota, USA - NOV 2, 2002
4.4 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 19/20
i guess call me strange iím going against the flow on this one i thought this was a good one or maybe thats the other beerís talking and this one needs to be rated again later.yah thats it rate again later
austinpowers (2826) - New York, New York, USA - NOV 1, 2002
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 13/20
Watery, watery and still watery. Come on guys, I know Breckenridge has a lot of snow but you didnít have to melt it all and put it in my beer. Easy drinkiní, like a bottle of Evian. Somehow, they got a nice aroma out of it, though.
bbrock81 (297) - Le Mars, Iowa, USA - OCT 29, 2002
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Not a very good beer. Tastes and feels watered down, barely any malt flavor, slight hoppy finish, not worth it.