kp (10884) - Woodstock, Georgia, USA - SEP 1, 2007
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Source: Taco Mac, Sandy Springs
clear yellow, whispy head, sweet malt aroma with crisp hops, light body and flavor with a good wheat character and underlying hops, slight bitterness
Aroma: 5/10; Appearance: 5/10; Flavor: 5/10; Palate: 5/10; Overall: 10/20
The score was calculated based upon the notes and an old scoring system.
KAggie97 (3529) - Ugly, Hot, and Humid Spring, Texas, USA - NOV 26, 2004
3.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
Like standing in a Kansas wheat field. A good example of a style I know and love.
Indra (2711) - Suburbia, Kansas, USA - OCT 1, 2001
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Fairly standard wheat, has a pretty ok hefe flavor but wins no points for originality.
Gusler (2653) - Tucson, Arizona, USA - SEP 25, 2002
2.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Pours a clear deep gold, the head is average, white, the lace marginal. Nose has hints of wheat, front is somewhat sweet, the top light, the finish is lightly hopped, mildly acidic, a tad dry, a ’Weak/Watery’ concoction that gains little favor with me. Ranks #992 on my current 1000 beer list, with its other brothers/sisters from this brewery.
RSRIZZO (1951) - Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA - SEP 21, 2007
2.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Had this beer on 10/15/1998. Color is a lightly hazed pale gold with low carbonation and head. A light sweet aroma. Taste is a light body that goes down bubbly. Finish is a lightly sweet malt flavor.
Foxbush (1820) - Richmond, Virginia, USA - JUL 1, 2013
3.5 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
12 oz bottle This was given to me by a friend at Holden Beach. It is a most drinkable ale. The aroma was mild with a hint of orange. The ale poured a nice golden color with a foamy head and lacing. This is a refreshing ale for the beach or golf. It was much better than expected. It is not a complex beverage. The carbonation was average with a medium body. The finish had orange and pale grain.
kyzr (1379) - Montana, USA - FEB 23, 2005
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Thick hazy yellow with off-white head. Lite fruity nose. Very lite hop, touches of wheat flavor.
Kaya161 (1139) - San Diego, California, USA - JAN 5, 2001
3.9 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
Very light in color. Poured with a small head. Nice wheat flavour with subtle hop notes. Great with a slice of lemon.
erway (1004) - Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA - JUN 11, 2002
2.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
A very sub-par wheat. Not enough wheat or yeast and a very one-dimensional beer. Breckenridge seems more interested in maintaining a repor and image with the rich skiers than with making truly remarkable beer.
krisbierjaeger (844) - dolores, Colorado, USA - NOV 2, 2002
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
another snoozer from the little brewery that won’t. dirty yellow, almost ochre, with light haze. tattered gauze head with all the delicate lace of a flack jacket. light honey-apple aroma. the "mountain wheat" doesn’t add much. maybe that explains the problem, though: maybe wheat doesn’t grow any better in the mountains than avocados do. light apple and wheat bread flavor, modest sweetness prevails because of particularly parsimonious hopping. more interesting than an ordinary lager, and it was remedial on a big thirst. some beers just gotta come down right in the middle, so it’s nicely drinkable without being remotely remarkable.