3.6 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20 cyrenaica (745) - Milton, Ontario, CANADA - JUL 7, 2007
UPDATED: AUG 18, 2007 I loved this beer, I really did. I was in University when I first tried this. I was a slave to the mainstream breweries when this happened in my glass.
To me, the aroma is fruity in nature, which made me skeptical from the beginning. Being colour blind, I will not comment on colour aside from saying it isn’t dark, nor is it light. As for the flavour, I love it. It has a full flavour not found in a lot of mainstream beer.
2.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 8/20 DerWeg (1251) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - JUN 1, 2006
Smells like a decent, tame Micro somethingorother. Drinking it makes my palate scrapingly dry, like some beers I drank in the eighties. I’m down with the mentions of butterscotch, graininess and I will add lack of hop personality - it is an odd package that,as tupalev says does have flavor.Too light body and veers into Macro territory with the feel and aftertaste. Is there corn that makes it rather Labbatt Blue-like? Bring on the Craft Brewers Alliance B-S, I was expecting it. And now... for the silly 200th rating music...
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20 tupalev (2708) - Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA - APR 17, 2006
Bottle at the Rhino. Medium yellow, very small white head, a few streaming bubbles. Sweet malt, grainy aroma - not terribly pleasant. Sweet malt taste but incredibly light body. Weird grainy taste. Not very good - very thin - but there is some flavour.
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20 MrManning (1942) - London, Ontario, CANADA - FEB 23, 2006
Bottle from the LCBO-341 ml sample- Amber body with a fluffy white head. A weak aroma promises slight caramel, malt sweetness, and a smidgen of hops. Watery caramel flavours are paired up with mild hops bitterness and hay. Decent level of carbonation make this an easy drinker, a good lawnmower beer, and not much else.
1.6 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20 mds (2115) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - NOV 9, 2005
bottle. LCBO singles bin. pale golden-copper body with a large white head that shortly diminishes into a small ring. pungent aroma, oh this should be a treat. light butterscotch notes. the flavour isn’t quite as offensive as the aroma suggests - though there really isn’t anything interesting to say. soft carbonation, sweet honey and caramel. not completely awful.
1.1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20 HogTownHarry (4809) - Toronto (Harbourfront), Ontario, CANADA - AUG 27, 2005
Bottle (341ml, clear). *My bottle says "Brick Amber", which I cannot find on the site, so I’m putting the rating here* Poured a plae gold, big fast-dropping white foamy head. Aroma - skunk! I can’t smell anything else, wow that’s bad, but I’m rating it because they are stupid enough to use clear bottles. Tastes skunky, but also sweet malt, stale grains. Weak mouthfeel. Guh.
1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20 Sammy (5885) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - APR 5, 2005
starts sticky malty thin, and then drying finish and aftertaste. I have had worse macros, but this is a slightly more amber looking pale lager.
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20 dirkules (627) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - OCT 3, 2004
It’s amber and it shares a lot in common with it’s fellow Canadian lagers in that they are poor representations of beer. Shameful!
|