 jason (1621), Easton, Pennsylvania, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 |
Aug 31, 2006 Bottle. Better than bud? I wouldn’t have guessed. Taste the same= nasty. Yuck!
BrewskiNigga (12), Brewski, Maryland, USA
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 9/20 |
Aug 21, 2006 Better than Regular bud. NOt good beer though. better than Coors Original.
They should advertise this on TV. Get people aware there is Dry beer out there.
TechMyst (166), Fox River Grove, Illinois, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 |
Aug 19, 2006 not much better than BUD, why is this the most consumed style of beer? and not only is this a poor style, they continue to do a poor job in this style
jpm30 (1588), East Central, Georgia, USA
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/20 |
Aug 9, 2006 From a 16 oz. can with a born on date on the bottom of can, 13.JUL.06, served in a large restaurant clear glass.
Poured a clear pale straw golden with a foamy white head that settled into a thin sudsy lacing.
Had a nose of grain husks and a clean, sweet pale malty, no big corny scents, but something tells me there is corn or rice or both in this.
Good carbonation and a dry, softly crisp and smooth light bodied mouthfeel.
Clean, dry, but bland tasting, dry sweet tasteless rice malts, a soft bitterness that could be hops, finally a very subtle corn flavor towards the end and a dry almost tasteless malt finish, o.k. lunchtime drinkability, as long as you’re not paying for it.
Had this today at local restaurant in Chesterfield, Missouri today, glad my company was paying for it.
Cornfield (4926), Oak Forest, Illinois, USA
| 0.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 3/20 |
Jul 31, 2006 Looks like seltzer water that someone leaked into. The only aroma, and thankfully it’s quite faint, that I’m picking up is that of a cleanser. No hops in the taste ( Surprise!) and only a suggestion of malt. Crap. <font size=-4><a href=http://www.ratebeer.com/Places/ShowPlace.asp? Liquors, Bridgeview, IL<font size=-1>
sisyphus12 (98), Belmont, Massachusetts, USA
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 4/20 |
Jul 22, 2006 I had this in college. I did not like it. Its pour was bland and uneventful with what appeared to be synthesized bubbles as they dissipated eerily quickly. I do not remember much of the taste but I will wager that is because it was devoid of enjoyable qualities
Sputerbug (112), Nacogdoches, Texas, USA
| 0.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 |
Jul 12, 2006 12oz can.Pours light yellow with a slight white head that fizzles out very fast.A little drier than a regular Bud without the bitter bite.
FlySwatter (34), USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 |
Jul 11, 2006 There is nothing good about this beer. I haven’t found any socalled dry beer that is worth drinking even if it is free.
|
Rate This
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)