 ben4321 (994), Rockville, Maryland, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 |
Feb 25, 2009 Aroma: A joke
Appearance: Like a poor man’s Bud Light
Flavor: You must be kidding
Palate: No words
Overall Impression:
I promise, you won’t enjoy this one. It’s terrible, even for a Bud. Aroma? Flavor? Ha! Try watery crappy NASCAR Beer.
CheersMate1 (789), Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 |
Feb 25, 2009 Whoa, this beer is clear. Basically, it is next to water. This beer just had a very nasty aroma as well. I thnk I am going to leave the score the way it is. I think this beer is the lowest of low. I was surpised to see it. Not a very good flavor either. Um, not much to say other than this beer will get you drunk, but for other uses such as taste, it is useless.
IlanMan (817), Appleton, Wisconsin, USA
| 0.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 |
Feb 21, 2009 No, I did not buy this. That being said, I literally tasted nothing while drinking this brew. Very smooth and very not beer. I have to say that I liked this a bit more than bud light or regular but that is just because those beers have bad flavors and this one has none. Anheuser has finally gone to the point to where they produce beer that tastes even more like nothing. This beer gets a 2 on overall impression for the sole reason that it doesn’t taste like crap because it doesn’t taste, period. Damn amazing!
nqualls (1429), Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 |
Jan 26, 2009 Why ask why? Because this beer stinks. I would ask why someone forced me to drink this crud.
Beardface (991), Eugene, Oregon, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 |
Dec 8, 2008 Why ask why? If its the last thing you do on this earth, please do not try Bud Dry!
topherh (899), Kearney, Missouri, USA
| 1.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 3/10 | 3/5 | 3/20 |
Dec 4, 2008 Used to drink this by the 30 pack as it was cheap. Resampled and it is thin watery and generally not good. Not as sweet as Bud Light or Bud, but not much better.
SkyCop32 (286), Morlautern, Germany
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 4/20 |
Oct 25, 2008 Bud Dry was a big craze until people realized it didn’t taste good. Marketing sells and it doeasn’t matter that it isclear, watery and no taste.
mweber962000 (70), Illinois, USA
| 0.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 1/20 |
Oct 20, 2008 599 a sixer. i got what i expected. i like the finish better than bud light but this beer is interchangeable with any of the mass produced pale lagers. will drink again because its not expensive. just nothing special. i cant believe i have never had this until now. and i live in st louis and its not available in alot of places.
|
Rate This
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)