elsberry (87), North Carolina, USA
| 0.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 2/5 | 2/20 | Jan 12, 2004 Updated: Feb 3, 2004When I saw this in the corner, I was amazed, simply because I thought they had stopped production of this monster, so I bought a six just for the heck of it. This is better than Bud, for sure. It has no taste, which makes it better. golden pour, with a slight haze. Aroma of yeast, and a light struck smell (skunky). No head past 5 seconds, and no lacing. heavily carbonated, with a dry finish, and a mild crispness of hops. Watery mouthfeel, very light. Not a drain pour, but really close. hotstuff (3175), Indiana, USA
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/20 | Dec 16, 2003 Can. The head was small sized, white with fine-small sized bubbles that quickly dissipated. The body was carbonated and clear with a urine hue. The nose was skunky and the flavor and mouthfeel was very dry and boring. There was no lacing with this beer. Gotta rate them all and I'm so glad this one is out of the way and never to be tasted again!! thedm (3834), Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 3/5 | 2/20 | Dec 15, 2003 TheDM and Hotstuff vacation brew 1. After stopping at several beer stores, we found this beer in Bowling Green Kentucky. Having not seen it before, we bought a can and took it to a nearby restaurant, asked for a pair of glasses and rated it! This brew poured a small head of finely sized white colored mostly diminishing bubbles that left beind a poor lace and a transparent urine urine yellow colored body. The aroma was rice beer like and skunky. The mouthfeel was bubbly, tingly and a had a dry finish. The mild rice beer flavor finished with a mild hop bite. Get only as a must have. jturmel12 (4), Lutz, Florida, USA does not count | 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 | Nov 29, 2003 Was very dissapointed in this beer.. Had high expectations and went out and bought some and it SUCKED alcoholica (128), Dublin, Ohio, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Nov 17, 2003 This is a crap marketing tool. This is a crap beer. This comes from a crap brew. Crap, essence of crap smell of crap, taste of crap, sight of crap, makes me feel like crap, sounds crappy, doesn't it. wulfhere (217), Billings, Montana, USA
| 1.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 5/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 | Nov 11, 2003 Why make this beer? Doesn't Budweiser and Bud Light just about cover all Anheuser Busch needs to offer in the American Pilsner category? carboloader (319), Houston, Texas, USA
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/20 | Nov 6, 2003 Just trying to knock off beers I haven't tried. I had zero expectations for this one, and it pretty much fulfilled them -- close to zero. I can't tell the difference between this and other macros I've tasted. No skunky flavor at least. And moderate alcohol content. gjamieson (75), Canton, Georgia, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Oct 6, 2003 Cold pee-pee in a bottle. There aren't 75 more characters to describe this shit.
|