Bud Dry

Formerly brewed at Anheuser-Busch InBev
Style: Pale Lager
St. Louis, Missouri USA

Serve in Dimpled mug, English pint, Lager glass, Shaker

This isn't such a bad beer as such, for a macroswill. I liked the dry taste, because plain old Bud is fairly nasty with it's aftertaste. I've had better beers, though.

I thought this beer was going to be really nasty because the can looked like it was 5 years old but it wasn't bad. I was eerily suprised.

My last rating before the bottom fell out. But this is crap, I bought it to rate for an early 90's novelty experience. Remember the Dry beer craze? Ugh! A bud that gives you more cotton mouth but has less of that sweet corn taste. To me as good as Bud, and Bud isnt good. Why ask why? Oh I can tell you why you should ask why!!!

higher alc but worse taste than bud light. Has a peculiar tangyness/alcohol/water taste. Only recommend if its free, then again I recommend about any free beer. Beware of the hangover.

Drinkable only when very cold and you are very hot. Then best to drink in gulps not to actually taste this less than spectacular brew. Actually slightly better than bud but that is saying little.

Don't ask why. Avoid Bud Dry.

I had one of these once cannot really remember what it tasted like, as if it really had a taste to begin with, but I have had worse.

UPDATED: MAR 1, 2003 I had hoped this stuff was off the market. It’s very bad and I refuse to give it a description. Why would I relive such a nightmare?