solocup (49), sandy, Utah, USA
| 3.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 15/20 |
Oct 20, 2002 Why ask why?
 beastdog75 (337), Brick, New Jersey, USA
| 1.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 1/5 | 5/10 | 1/5 | 8/20 |
Oct 4, 2002 Yes, they do still make this. The cans I had were "born on" July of 2002. The New Coke analogy is dead on. Take Bud, add more rice and water, and somehow make it leave no aftertaste and this is what you have.
dominion (78), charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 |
Oct 1, 2002 This could be called the ass of the beer world. Taste is horrible
HH (165), Everett, Washington, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 |
Oct 1, 2002 This is not even on their website. Do you suppose they did the world a favor and dropped this crap?
Gunshy (479), Ohio, USA
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 7/20 |
Jul 28, 2002 I haven’t seen this beer for awhile, but I used to have it a lot. It had a dry finish, to be sure, but was still a very weak american lager style typical of Budweiser
Volgon (2488), Manchester, New Hampshire, USA
| 0.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 |
Jul 27, 2002 You can do better. Much better.
labattblueleaf (225), Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 |
Jul 27, 2002 Just like the original, with a dry aftertaste. I do like it better than Bud.
DrunkAsASkunk (847), Lynnwood, Washington, USA
| 0.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 |
Jul 25, 2002 Somehow Anheuser-Busch keeps coming up with crappier and crappier beer. Taste sucks, start to finish. Bitter and with no body. Go get a coke instead.
|
Rate This
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)