1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
The words ’dry’ and ’beer’ do not belong together. Do they still make this?
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
I didn’t know they still made this crap....
0.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Not able too drink
0.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
I remember this being a favorite
at keggers in college. It was
drinkable, when really cold. I guess
it has a little more body than regular
Bud. The flavor, though, is just as bad
and even more concentrated.
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
UPDATED: OCT 1, 2004 The beer pours from the 12-ounce brown bottle a limpid gold with a modest white frothy head and the left over lace a thin sheet. Nose is sweet malt, fresh and clean, start is lightly sweet and the top skeletal. Finish is caustic in its acidity, hops benign and the aftertaste dry, it has been almost 4 years since I sampled one of these, now I know why.
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Hey easiest review yet, I didn’t need to cahnge anything. Worst beer ever. Even in my days before I developed an appreciation for good beer I knew this was bad. I tried it before I was of age and my friend’s brother said they didn’t have what we requested so he got us something good, that something was Bud Dry; it wasn’t good. It’s so bad most stores don’t even carry it, rednecks cringe at the thought of Bud Dry.
|
