 Slick (1962), Thief River Falls, Minnesota, USA
| 1.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 6/20 |
Aug 4, 2003 Is this real beer,I don't know but i do know when i have a can of swill in my hand,and this is definately one of those times.other then the color being good the rest is quite bad,no head that was worth mentioning,the taste was weak and corny with the after taste being quite forgettable.definatley a brew that shouldn't be.
MANNYQUARTERS (4), USA
does not count  | 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 8/10 | 4/5 | 9/20 |
Aug 2, 2003 dude, this is an awesome beer. seirously, a lot of Ice beers are awesome but this is really awesome. I should know, I'm 19. Maybe the appeerance needs work but dude, this beer rocks and rolls. Its a perfect beer when your with your buddys at the paintball compound. I also like mikelob dry.
blank (998), Washington, Washington DC, USA
| 0.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/20 |
Jul 18, 2003 are they're really people who don't drink bud ice because it is too heavy? really? it just sounded like someone forgot to put the correct amount of filler in bud ice or something
EKGoldings (447), Radford, Virginia, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 |
Jul 18, 2003 Ice brewing was designed to allow low gravity fermentation and associated cleaner lower ester flavor than you would get with higher gravities, while retaining a higher alcohol level by freeze concentration. Otherwise you would just increase the sugar content of your wort to get the same abv. Ice beers would by definition have higher alcohol levels than their stable mates. The taste in this beer was as bad as I expected. No aroma to speak of, less of the cidery apple flavor I associate with AB products.
changxao (104), South Carolina, USA
| 1.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/20 |
Jul 12, 2003 Less distasteful than Bud Ice, but c'mon what's the deal with Bud Ice Light having less alcohol than regular Bud Light isn't that the point of an ice beer? I do like the bottle even if it is clear.
drewcifer85710 (158), Youngstown, Ohio, USA
| 0.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 |
Jun 18, 2003 No taste whatsoever. If you needed to feed beer to sorority girls or something I guess this one might be appropriate. Interesting bottle.
AustinMilbarge (681), Denver, Colorado, USA
| 1.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/20 |
Apr 6, 2003 And you thought Bud Ice was terrible. This feels like you have to chew it to get it down, but not in a good Imperial Stout type of way. I'll chalk this one up to being in my youth and trying new things.
buddahh420 (4), bellevue, Nebraska, USA
does not count | 4.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 8/10 | 5/5 | 10/10 | 1/5 | 20/20 |
Apr 3, 2003 unlike most of the other people rating beer on this site my beer doesen't have to be in the over 7% alcohal content. I find this beer to be very refreshing and very polite to my wallet thanx anyway I'LL KEEP ON GETTING ON HANDELING MY BUISINESS!!!!!!
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)