Beerathon (1683) - Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, USA - JUL 17, 2012
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
This beer is not as bad as people make it out to be. It’s a very average wheat beer, that has nice citrus notes. If it were a blind taste test, I bet a lot of drinkers wouldn’t be so negative.
oddaroma (139) - Texas, USA - JUL 4, 2012
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
A decent try from A/B. I was completely ready to be disappointed with this one only to be mildly shocked when it was not bad. Very drinkable and no bad "wheat" aftertaste that can happen with some cheaper wits. I hope that they give it another try later on.
ammali (1) - Alabama, USA - JUN 30, 2012 does not count
4.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 20/20
I loved this one, really sad its no longer available. Perfect for one who likes the Belgian-style wheat ales but is looking for a lighter, crisper taste or, as I was, about half the calories of a traditional unfiltered wheat ale. Like a lighter Blue Moon or something. I hope they bring this back one day.
Headbanger (3847) - Aurora, Illinois, USA - JUN 27, 2012
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
12oz bottle 6/27/12 (Binny’s Naperville Singles Rack)-42° in Shaker-Pours a hazy yellowish orange with a small white head. Aroma of wheat and nothing. Taste of wheat, citrus, and slight coriander. This light bodied brew is not as bad as I was expecting but still not good.
UnholyBrewing (595) - Central Florida(Upper Hell), Florida, USA - JUN 27, 2012
1.7 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
...well, this was crap, and I expected it to be crap. Like normal crap-light with some weird and weak wheat notes. Thin, watery, I should have known it was dookie, but I tried it anyway. Oh well, better than the original, but that’s not really saying anything. Junk.
Stldsf1 (616) - Florida, USA - JUN 27, 2012
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Not a bad idea here. Miss out. Not bad for a quick cheap wheat.
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
BrewBoxer (2593) - New York, New York, USA - MAY 8, 2012
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Bottle. Hazy orange color, nicer foam then expected... thought it looked better then it tasted. Skunky and watery with some citrus that went bad. The lime one is better
burg326 (5368) - Florida, USA - MAY 2, 2012
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
12 ounce bottle, aromas of wheat and oranges. Flavor is weak wheat and oranges, nothing too special to note, still better than regular Bud Light.
Onenote81 (1002) - Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA - APR 20, 2012
2.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Original review: 12/8/09. Was watching the Packer game last night at a local pub, after consuming some of the good craft offerings, decided to give this one a shot.
Came out a very murky dark gold with a thin eggshell-white head on top. Little retention, and even less sticky lace. Scents of orange zest, honey, and biscuits. The mouth was crisp and bubbly, but still held a slight pleasant creamy feel. Flavors of light citrus, honey-kissed breads, and sweet wheat. This was very sweet in fact. Could stand a bit more of a balancing bitterness, but what did I really expect from AB? Refreshing beer. All in all, this was a pleasant surprise. Nothing I would go out to get as there are obvious better craft wheats out there, but not bad.
Isidor (16) - - APR 17, 2012
1.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Pours hazy golden with a thin head. Aromas of orange and wheat. Easy to drink though not very flavorful. Not so bad for AB