ryanfolty (1737) - Bourbon County, Minnesota, USA - DEC 22, 2011
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Surprisingly or maybe not (since having it once was enough) have forgot to rate this one. I had high hopes this would be decent as I do enjoy wheat beers, but in the end it really is just Bud Light with a little citrus.
ronaldtheriot (1066) - Laplace, Louisiana, USA - NOV 16, 2011
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Bud Light Golden Wheat has a very, thick, pillowy cream-colored head and a cloudy, golden appearance with brown yeast chunks floating about. Little lacing is left on the glass. The aroma is of a slight banana whiff and water. Taste is of white wheat bread, a touch of citrus, and a tad of hop bitterness, with a whole lot of water. Mouthfeel is light and watery, and Bud Light Golden Wheat finishes crisp, clean, refreshing, easy-drinking, and, unfortunately, a bit dull. Overall, this is a high-average beer. RJT
jcweaver (768) - VA Beach, Virginia, USA - NOV 4, 2011
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bottle. Actually a hint of tastiness. Too bad itís so watery and has a nasty finish. Pours pale orange with a small white head. Orange and light malts in the aroma. Watery with a decent but weak citrusy, wheat taste. Metallic and skunky finish.
beaz1591 (237) - Omaha, Nebraska, USA - OCT 14, 2011
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Pours a hazy golden orange color with a fizzy head that disappears after approx. 1 minute. Has minimal taste with hints of wheat and orange. Tastes a little better than regular Bud Light.
Ret12 (447) - Maryland, USA - SEP 5, 2011
0.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
As others have said this is more interesting than the lime or regular Light but still not to good.
ADesenberg (468) - Ohio, USA - AUG 29, 2011
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 3/20
Bottle: ok... Hereís an offering of one of those big beer macro fake micros that are popular lately. Itís a little sweet, but ok if your choices are limited. Itís definately drinkable.
beastdog75 (362) - Brick, New Jersey, USA - AUG 6, 2011
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
More interesting than regular Bud Light, but still pretty much just a light beer. Grainy flavor with light orange/citrus flavor, slightly bitter in finish.
rjplumer (351) - Foxboro, Massachusetts, USA - JUL 30, 2011
3.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Pours a mild hazy gold color with a minimal head. Very faint fruity aroma. Has a mild citrus malt flavor thatís a little sour. Itís better than your average Bud Light.
FROTHINGSLOSH (4471) - GREENSBURG, Pennsylvania, USA - JUL 27, 2011
2.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Sampled from a 12 oz brown bottle this beer poured a hazy apricot color with a large foamy yellow-white head that lingered and left some lacing. The aroma was tangy, industrial and a bit dry. The flavor was dryish and fairly malty with touches of wheat and nut. Medium length dryish malty finish. Medium body. Better than I expected.
dbarnold (1125) - Bethesda, Maryland, USA - JUL 23, 2011
2.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Not horrible, but a little too sweet for my taste. Does work like a wheat ale; cloudy, grassy, little bit of body and refreshing...just gets to sugary to be a good wheat.