hogan873 (449) - Joliet, Illinois, USA - OCT 4, 2009
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Not a bad effort by AB. Slightly cloudy amber body with a thin white head. Light, faint aroma of wheat, yeast, and sweet citrus. Somewhat thin palate, which isnít surprising. Decent flavor of malt, yeast, and citrus. Not much spice to speak of. A thirst quencher.
slowrunner77 (5804) - Reno, Nevada, USA - OCT 5, 2014
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
"this was 1.25 happy hour special whilst waiting for my wings, so...what the hell. the paintball commercial is just great! anyway...aroma was still skunky. the coriander & citrus tried to come out, but the skunk overpowered them. too bad. appearance a little transparent, but there was actually yeast on the bottom. cool. mouthfeel still sucked. fizzy and thin. gave me gas almost immediately. flavor a slight pleasant surprise. some ornage and spice. not really any wheat. still too light and boring but not revolting. it actually was almost average, which says a ton for BL. not something Iíll get again, but BLs best product to date."
HonusWagner (1422) - Florida, USA - MAY 23, 2014
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
The beer pours a very hazy light orange color, which lends it some degree of authenticity as a wheat beer. I donít think itís a gorgeous looking beer by any stretch of the imagination, but itís definitely not a weak offering. On the nose I detect almost nothing except for some wheat. Unlike the eye test, where this beer more or less passes, the nose offers almost no indication that this beer will have any authenticity to it. Thereís wheat, but how hard is it to get some wheat into a generic lager? Youíd like there to be some notable citrus or spice aromas, at least a sign that the yeast strain wasnít the blandest thing possible. But BLGW offers almost nothing worth writing down, smell-wise. The taste is more of the same, with a somewhat sweet wheat taste up front that goes down very cleanly on the back end. No horrible off flavors, but nothing particularly spectacular either. The mouthfeel is also unremarkable and exactly mimics traditional Bud Light, watery and blah. Drinkability, Iíd imagine, would be pretty high. Low alcohol content, somewhat sweet to make you want to drink more, not enough bitterness or off flavors to dissuade you from continuing. I hate to give InBev credit, but you have to give it where itís due, and theyíve made a solidly drinkable light lager with more flavor than the competition. What thatís worth is a product of your personal calculus.
From my blog, 2010.
nakedwhendrunk (2196) - Juneau, Alaska, USA - MAY 15, 2014
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Yes, Iím mowing through some BMC stuff. More notes were found and this is how this one will go.
I poured this into a pint glass.
The appearance was a hazy golden amber to orange color with a quickly dissipating one finger head. I heard it fizz as it settled. There was no lacing.
The smell had some caramel malts along with a breadiness coming about.
The taste took those aromas and made it taste heavy on the mouth and tongue. There is a super long wheaty finish and it didnít have any aftertaste.
On the palate, it sat about at a medium on the body with a quality that wants you to think its sessionable, but actually there seems to be a bit too much wheat in there.
Overall, actually, one of the better Budweiser products to me, though probably not one to seek out, but would rather have this one over some other products on the market.
TXBadger (1421) - Dallas, Texas, USA - MAY 15, 2014
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
You can smell the coriander and citrus peel on the aroma, a little on the palate but not much there in terms of flavor.
subsonic (82) - Pataskala, Ohio, USA - DEC 27, 2013
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
"great for byob parties or any other event where large quantities of people want to drink your beer. pours with no aroma or color.
DedicatedToFun (2617) - Santa Monica, California, USA - OCT 6, 2013
1.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Not a very good beer, light and easy to drink, bottle, interesting to see this was made
rumproasts (2936) - Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA - SEP 14, 2013
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
bottle. Golden with small head. Water beer with a little bit of orange thrown in. Very forgettable.
dr_sarcastor (66) - - JUN 29, 2013
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
It tastes like a generic soda would taste if they were trying to make a wheat beer, awful.
-- rated via 'Find A Beer' for Blackberry 10
jcnielsen (2187) - Charlotte, North Carolina, USA - JUN 9, 2013
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bottle. Pours an orange color with white head. Orange, coriander, malty aromas. Malty, citrus flavors, slightly oxidized but that may due to age. Still sucks pretty bad.
adnielsen (9247) - Fort Collins, Colorado, USA - JUN 9, 2013
1.6 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Bottle in KC, aged in my cellar just about two years now. Pours a cloudy orange appearance with a decent white head. Big coriander, spicy, orange citrusy aroma. Tangy bready, quite spicy, coriander, paper flavor. Not as good as Blue Moon by far. Unfortunately showing some signs of oxidation so I would recommend everyone drinking through any bottles that may have been put away in the cellar.