bluemooner (657) - East Bethel, Minnesota, USA - MAY 31, 2012
0.8 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Clear, pale, golden with a fizzy white head. Aroma is weak with bready and grainy notes. Flavor is is hardly noticeable but essentially the typical watery swill. Increased ABV is hardly noticeable as well. I donít understand this brew as it is just a Bud Light.
DasBierChef (1083) - Hudson, Wisconsin, USA - MAY 31, 2012
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
What happens when you mix bud light with alcohol? You get this nasty ass beer.
umich03jm (3381) - Flat Rock, Michigan, USA - MAY 30, 2012
0.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Absolutely gross. Tasted like bud light mixed with vodka. I bought this based on curiosity only but I had to pour out almost the whole bottle. Surprised this is actually rated higher than budweiser.
Hophead22 (2879) - Redlands, by way of Wisconsin,, California, USA - MAY 30, 2012
1.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
12oz bottle. Rating #193. Clear and pale yellow pour with a thin white head. Not much aroma, picking up a little graininess and a bit of skunk. Mild flavor, no bitterness, lightly sweet grains and very little aftertaste. Not horrible really, it doesnít have that sick sweetness that I get from the usual Bud products which made it drinkable for me. (2390)
XmnwildX12 (2079) - Farmington, Minnesota, USA - MAY 27, 2012
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Super clear pale yellow color, super fizzy. Smells like a skunky lager and taste like water with a hint of copper.
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
OD40oz (774) - Box Elder, South Dakota, USA - MAY 26, 2012
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Had one of these during the Super Bowl and immediately went back to drinking Budweiser. Better than Bud Light, but not by much!
Tide (2763) - Espoo, FINLAND - MAY 21, 2012
1.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Bottle at bar. Golden color, white head. Watery taste with some citrus. Drinkable.
kp (10884) - Woodstock, Georgia, USA - MAY 20, 2012
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
Date: April 01, 2012
Source: Tasting, First Sunday
Appearance: clear light gold, fine white head, sudsy lace
Aroma: cereal aroma, touch of green apple
Flavor: sweet malt flavor, light candy quality, just a touch of hops and bitterness
Aroma: 3/10; Appearance: 5/10; Flavor: 3/10; Palate: 5/10; Overall: 6/20
Score: * /4
CanIHave4Beers (3942) - Pouring Bus, Iowa, USA - MAY 19, 2012
1.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 7/20
Really pale, kind of a small well retained head. The aroma is actually more like a Helles than a Pale Lager. Some sweet grainy malt, some honey, but also some malt liquor corny and alcoholic notes too,.
The flavor is pretty much like malt liquor. Iím really surprised, lots of folks Iíve talked to said this had a very neutral flavor and fit the Bud Light name perfectly. It doesnít at all, the fusel corn, the alcohol, the light cloying sweetness, theyíre all there... folks who are paying inflated prices for a sixer of this would do well to go with Olde English 800... this is particularly worse than that beer and the label isnít nearly as nice looking.
ACHops (1270) - Seattle, Washington, USA - MAY 19, 2012
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
UPDATED: MAY 20, 2012 For some strange reason, Iíve been intrigued by this beer. I couldnít understand why it existed, nor was Bud eager to tell me. It took finding it in a friends fridge to try it. Honestly, itís been a while since Iíve had a Bud Light, but this does seem superior. Slightly richer corn malt flavor with that same watery taste and crisp flavorless finish. The alcohol is well hidden for a macro of this quality. Really not much here, though you could easily do worse in the cheap light macro category.