bum76 (25) - port washington, Wisconsin, USA - APR 16, 2012
4.7 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 19/20
A very smooth drinking Beer with no after taste and it is as strong as Beat Ice, canít wait to see how well this slides in summer when itís warm out.
damzz (442) - Massachusetts, USA - APR 15, 2012
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Pours a pale yellow with a fleeting white head. No nose - really. Lacing is slight. Palate is slightly sweet with extremely slight hop bitterness. Cabornation is low.The body is fuller than Bud Light. The alcohol boost is obvious. The operative understanding is this beer is "slight" except for the alcohol. It is "beer" because it meets the most basic requirements - made from whatever grain, yeast, hops (hopefully), and water, The bottle picture on this site is wrong. It is cobalt blue indicating it is a "chick" beer as is Michelob Ultra. Oh wait, why am I drinking it? Oh, right, Iím rating it :>). Itís the 6% alcohol befuddling me. Enjoy!
Bcoble003 (286) - Aiea, Hawaii, USA - APR 14, 2012
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
Another terrible beer from bud, these guys need to stop... also how is a light beer 137 calories? unbelievable, why is it so sweet? can anyone answer this for me? besides the 6% alcohol i would have given this bottle of sugar total 0.
ContemplateBeer (1945) - Louisville, Kentucky, USA - APR 13, 2012
1.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Not much to say here, an even sweeter version of Bud Light, which makes it nigh undrinkable.
edgallow (3477) - nashville, Tennessee, USA - APR 13, 2012
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
12 oz bottle pours yellow with a white head. Aroma and taste are not to my liking. Another bad beer by the big brewery.
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
dimenhetfield (2486) - , Florida, USA - APR 13, 2012
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
12oz poured into clear plastic cup. Very piss poor version of Bud Light. Not too much different then regular Bud Light
bshep (144) - - APR 12, 2012
1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
I donít understand the hype... Exacly the same as Bud Light with 1% more alcohol... What else do you expect from people who have never had a real beer? Never falling into that trap again
EvilPuppet99 (37) - Wisconsin, USA - APR 12, 2012
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Thicker than regular Bud Light and is in a really pretty blue bottle. Im a lager fan so I like it. I also love that it has 6.0% APV which really pisses of the stout drinkers. Overall very drinkable and hey is not too pricey for a filler beer.
demmbonz (716) - Erin, Wisconsin, USA - APR 7, 2012
0.9 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Pours urine sample yellow with a frothy pond scum head to match. Tastes like pruno fermented from bananas. On the plus side, you will have to drink less of these to get properly hamboned and therefore will need to relieve yourself less often than every 3 mins.
radarsock (1146) - Massachusetts, USA - APR 7, 2012
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Tastes and smells predominately of regularized Bud Light but with more of an alcoholic bite. Iím not kidding, thatís all thatís different: more alcohol. Itís just the same shitty pale lager as before.