RateBeer
overall
1
19
style

bottled
common

on tap
common

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 442   WEIGHTED AVG: 1.62   EST. CALORIES: 180   ABV: 6%
Share this beer with friends!
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Bud Light Platinum has reinvented the category of light beer. Within each cobalt blue bottle lies a bold formula thatís triple filtered with a smooth finish to create its stop shelf taste. Its the first of its kind, and the only beer worthy of the name Bud Light Platinum.


2.9
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 11/20
pkbites (678) - Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA - FEB 10, 2012
Strange combo. Time for some "beer math": This only has 8 calories less than Regular Budweiser, but it has 20% more alcohol. It has 10% more alcohol than Bud ice. But Bud Ice only has 123 calories per 12 ounce serving. This looks and smells like regular old Budweiser. It tastes like Bud Light with a bit less watery flavor. If youíre thinking of drinking this to save calories, forget it. If youíre drinking for an alcohol buzz, THIS might be your brew. Itís not Colt Blast, but 6% is nothing to sneeze at. This does not have the syrupy consistency that 6% malt liquors have, and it doesnít have that weird alcohol taste that many ice beers have. There is no maltyness or hops detected, but the flavor is not without itís charm. Itís kind of grainy, but I donít know if the grain is corn or rice. I donít detect corn, but I donít detect the sweetness that rice beers exhibit. Could it contain both corn and rice? I never thought Iíd say this, but this is the first high alcohol thirst quencher Iíve ever had. I wish this site had a category for value, though, as Iíd give this a 0!!! $6.49 for 6 pack of it is wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy over priced. Otherwise itís really not too shabby! -P.K. Beitz.

0.7
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 3/20
redwings36 (4) - junction city, Kansas, USA - FEB 9, 2012 does not count
This beer is horrible. I honestly dont even know how to rate the aftertaste I was very dissapointed I guess you cant always just think it taste good because it says "platinum" this beer is very overpriced.

2
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 10/20
joebudzjoe (668) - Connecticut, USA - FEB 9, 2012
This beer has more taste than your typical Bud Light...more of a grain alcohol taste. Still, this is a watery beer with little taste, so if this is the same price as regular Bud Light, go with this one for the extra booze.

1.3
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 5/20
Dixonian (1561) - Plano, Texas, USA - FEB 9, 2012
Bottle thanks to swalden28. Just terrible - InBev is obviously trying to combat the recent craft beer boom with disguisting crap like this. Piss yellow pour, metallic and grainy. Cheap adjuncts all over this. Laughable.

1.5
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 5/20
dfinney23 (1643) - Houston, Texas, USA - FEB 8, 2012
UPDATED: MAR 14, 2012 Umm, better than Bud Light... You donít have to choke as many down, thanks to the increased alcohol, but it also does seem to taste a bit better. Or maybe "platinum" just *sounds* like it should be richer.

2.2
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 8/20
Strykzone (4910) - Wood River, Illinois, USA - FEB 8, 2012
Sampled at an esbls tasting. This was very clear ans "trle filtered." A bit of a white head. A malty nose and flavor. This was surprisingly boozy for 6%. Ok, I have had it.

0.5
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
UNCLEDOC (3) - Michigan, USA - FEB 8, 2012 does not count
The best thing about this is the blue bottle. Not much different than Bud Light in color or flavor. What are they trying to make, "The first FULL calorie light beer"? Bud Light has become the Mountain Dew of the beer industry, put liquid in a bottle and hope it sells because of the name.

1.7
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 6/20
RobertDale (3404) - Lansing, Kansas, USA - FEB 8, 2012
12 ounce bottle. Pours pale yellow with a decent white head. Aroma of sweet malt and grain. Taste is the same with a bit of skunk. As already stated, the best thing is the bottle.

2.4
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 8/20
legion242 (2172) - Richardson, Texas, USA - FEB 7, 2012
Really not that bad. Would much rather have this then regular Bud Light. The added alcohol gives it a heftier mouthfeel then the regular and makes for a more enjoyable experience.

1.4
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 5/20
Chipalsa (1307) - Florida, USA - FEB 7, 2012
Hmm... Tastes just like the regular Iíd say. Lightly stale and bready malts are more apparent - making for a more filling brew altogether. Much better than bud light, and only a tad better than carbonated horse urine. Thatís right.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 35 36 37  38  39 40 41 » 45


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2014,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50