redwings36 (4) - junction city, Kansas, USA - FEB 9, 2012 does not count
0.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
This beer is horrible. I honestly dont even know how to rate the aftertaste I was very dissapointed I guess you cant always just think it taste good because it says "platinum" this beer is very overpriced.
joebudzjoe (671) - Connecticut, USA - FEB 9, 2012
2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
This beer has more taste than your typical Bud Light...more of a grain alcohol taste. Still, this is a watery beer with little taste, so if this is the same price as regular Bud Light, go with this one for the extra booze.
Dixonian (1562) - Plano, Texas, USA - FEB 9, 2012
1.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Bottle thanks to swalden28.
Just terrible - InBev is obviously trying to combat the recent craft beer boom with disguisting crap like this. Piss yellow pour, metallic and grainy. Cheap adjuncts all over this. Laughable.
dfinney23 (2317) - Houston, Texas, USA - FEB 8, 2012
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
UPDATED: MAR 14, 2012 Umm, better than Bud Light... You donít have to choke as many down, thanks to the increased alcohol, but it also does seem to taste a bit better. Or maybe "platinum" just *sounds* like it should be richer.
Strykzone (5811) - Wood River, Illinois, USA - FEB 8, 2012
2.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Sampled at an esbls tasting. This was very clear ans "trle filtered." A bit of a white head. A malty nose and flavor. This was surprisingly boozy for 6%. Ok, I have had it.
UNCLEDOC (3) - Michigan, USA - FEB 8, 2012 does not count
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
The best thing about this is the blue bottle. Not much different than Bud Light in color or flavor. What are they trying to make, "The first FULL calorie light beer"? Bud Light has become the Mountain Dew of the beer industry, put liquid in a bottle and hope it sells because of the name.
RobertDale (4414) - Lansing, Kansas, USA - FEB 8, 2012
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
12 ounce bottle. Pours pale yellow with a decent white head. Aroma of sweet malt and grain. Taste is the same with a bit of skunk. As already stated, the best thing is the bottle.
legion242 (2341) - Richardson, Texas, USA - FEB 7, 2012
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 8/20
Really not that bad. Would much rather have this then regular Bud Light. The added alcohol gives it a heftier mouthfeel then the regular and makes for a more enjoyable experience.
Chipalsa (1311) - Florida, USA - FEB 7, 2012
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Hmm... Tastes just like the regular Iíd say. Lightly stale and bready malts are more apparent - making for a more filling brew altogether. Much better than bud light, and only a tad better than carbonated horse urine. Thatís right.
zathrus13 (1739) - Mount Laurel, New Jersey, USA - FEB 7, 2012
1.6 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
What can you say. A light beer at 6%. Rather sweet, with corn and sugar in the aroma and flavor. Not offensive,but not much here.