drowland (6633) - Georgia, USA - FEB 5, 2012
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
2/5/12. 12oz blue bottle consumed during the superbowl - YEAHHH BRO, WOOOOO! Super clear lighter than piss yellow with a small white head thatís gone fast. Light aroma of corn and fusel alcohol with a little bit of rubber band... like other people said, itís kind of a light malt liquor. The flavor screams BMC... itís kinda weird to me, as I havenít had a Bud Light or anything in awhile and itís bringing back bad memories. Sweet flavor that shows green apple and a bit of other fruitiness... basically, this is Bud Light but sweeter. Meeehhhhh.
Tmoney99 (11619) - Cincinnati, Ohio, USA - FEB 5, 2012
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bottle. Poured clear pale color with an average frothy white head that was mostly lasting with good lacing. Light to medium balanced aroma. Light to medium body with a thin smooth texture and soft carbonation. Light medium sweet flavor with a light to medium sweet finish of short duration. Soft beer.
mar (4997) - Dallas, Texas, USA - FEB 5, 2012
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Pale gold with a white head. Nose is faint malts, hops, bland. Flavor is corn, stale, not much going on, a little more refreshing than water.
oteyj (2130) - New Hampshire, USA - FEB 5, 2012
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
This beer is wretched. To call it a beer is disrespectful to malt beverages all around the world. Awful macro lager with no redeeming qualities.
Ret12 (453) - Maryland, USA - FEB 5, 2012
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 10/20
For bud light this was not to bad at all..still a light beer but very drinkable and decently enjoyable.
rougeau13 (2132) - Richmond, Texas, USA - FEB 5, 2012
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Slightly more corn flakes in this than regular bud light. Still really watery, offensive and disgusting though.
MadIndian (2562) - Levittown, Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 5, 2012
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Corn , watery blah. Everything a bumble fu** backwards A$$ person would love.
arventresca (567) - Charlotte, North Carolina, USA - FEB 5, 2012
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
This is a sweeter stronger version of Bud Light. Something about this beer didnít sit well with me. Gave me a wicked headache after drinking just one. A beer I will stay away from in the future.
conciergeman (73) - Minnesota, USA - FEB 5, 2012
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Tasted on 1-20-12 in blue bottle, before it was out on the market. It is what I expected, wimpy nose, pale color, plain taste which I actually prefer over regular BL. A little more substance to it than BL and 6% is a plus, especially with 120 some calories it claims on the back of the bottle... somehow I dont buy it, but still nothing I would go out and purchase.
JFGrind (1893) - Glenside, Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 5, 2012
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Bud Light Platnium has made an appearance at the bar. Before the Super Bowl hype cracked a blue bottle and shared with a few beer drinkers. Corn, slight fizzle, yellow body, off flavored sweetness. Unanimously panned by the four taste testers. A brand that A-B will more than likely abandon in 12 months.