RateBeer
overall
n/a
1
style

bottled
common

on tap
common

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 2859   WEIGHTED AVG: 1.2   EST. CALORIES: 123   ABV: 4.1%
Share this beer with friends!
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Introduced nationally in 1982, Bud Light is brewed with a malt and hops ratio different from Budweiser for a distinctively crisp taste with fewer calories.


0.5
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
Kenvinbrew99 (3) - Tempe, Arizona, USA - JAN 16, 2002 does not count
Is this beer or water? Cant tell the difference.

0.7
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 2/20
666seth (222) - California, USA - JAN 15, 2002
This is even worse as its bud ’regular’ I don’t know what they mean with premium? Compared to water maybe. If you want to save you some money go ahead and buy water.

1.1
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 3/20
turtlehead (111) - Nottingham, New Hampshire, USA - JAN 14, 2002
What can you say.

4.3
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 9/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 18/20
markymark (82) - Duluth, Minnesota, USA - JAN 14, 2002
Like most of the people say, good for a LIGHT beer.....I like it probably better than Budweiser, too.....

1.8
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 8/20
blaker24099 (5) - Ballwin, Missouri, USA - JAN 14, 2002 does not count
Not a bad beer...if youre trying to keep your figure. Not much taste but not bad. For a light beer its not bad

1.2
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 2/20
joet (2138) - Santa Rosa, California, USA - JAN 12, 2002
UPDATED: OCT 30, 2008 Drinkable, wet, very mild to non-existent aroma when served very chilled in the bottle as recommended. gryhdfghdfghfghfdghdfghdh

2.3
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 10/20
Beerhound (16) - Tucson, Arizona, USA - JAN 12, 2002
Let me start off by saying, IMHO, this is not a bad beer. It is a very well crafted American Lite Lager, and it is very true to that style. There’s just not much to say about that style, tho’. There is hardly any aroma or flavor, which I guess is appropriate for this style. It is a very inoffensive beer, unless you are offended bu tasteless beers... <g> My tastes run to beers with some body and hop character and malt you can taste so you won’t normally catch me drinking this stuff, but in a pinch you can catch a buzz if there’s nothing else to drink...

1.6
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 5/20
Dougan (93) - Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, CANADA - JAN 12, 2002
Bud Lite is nothing but a normal Bud with more water added. Not impressed at all with any of the lite beers out there.

3.2
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 11/20
labattblueleaf (225) - Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA - JAN 10, 2002
If you are in the mood to get loaded, I strongly recommend drinking this. I have a bottle collection and the bottle I have of this is one from Texas I got on my honeymoon. It says ’Lone Star State’ on it and has a big fuckin’ Texas star on the label. It looks pretty cool.

5
   AROMA 10/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 10/10   PALATE 5/5   OVERALL 20/20
bebo8899 (1) - Arkansas, USA - JAN 8, 2002 does not count


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 267 268 269  270  271 272 273 » 286


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2014,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50