oddaroma (139) - Texas, USA - JUL 4, 2012
3.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Ale that has the characteristics of smaller batch brewing. Good semi-strong barley flavor with just enough hopness to get noticed. I found myself wanting one after another, a testament to the great finish.
Stldsf1 (616) - Florida, USA - JUN 27, 2012
2.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Not awful. Copper colored slightly hoppy caramel. Haven't seen this in a while. Not sure if it still exists.
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
MacBoost (1326) - Pouring Bus, New York, USA - MAY 16, 2012
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
from notes (is this even made anymore?): very Bass like in its pour and taste. Light on the hops. There are much better ambers out there if you want to find them. Scroll past this beer and this entire brewery.
Onenote81 (1002) - Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA - APR 20, 2012
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
Original review: 2/4/09. Poured an obvious amber with a massive white frothy head resting on top. Retention on this one was surprisingly firm as it held up for most of the entire drink. Some spotty lacing on glass edge. No more. Smelled of floral hops and caramel. Decent.
Very thin mouthfeel. Watery and weak. Flavor is very muted hop base, with no bitter bite at all. Red Ales need to be hoppy and bitter, this one was neither. Still, I could place some decent malt presence and definitive caramel backing. Finish was a tad chalky and drying. I really could drink a few of these. Not bad. Avoid the hate, check it out.
jmohno (1102) - Iowa, USA - APR 14, 2012
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Clear reddish copper with 1/2 inch head leaving it frothy with a bit of lacing.
Aroma is sweet malt carmel,somewhat bready slight smokiness almost- pretty nice malt aroma.
Full mouthfeel at first with creamyness,then some citrus hops,more malt carmel taste than hops with a bit of roast and finishes dry clean with a pretty tame citrusy tart bitterness.Its almost like a mild scottish ale/ mild ale.Not too bad.
Bricktop86 (573) - Moore, Oklahoma, USA - APR 8, 2012
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 8/20
UPDATED: JUL 13, 2012 This isnít a horrible beer. That being said, it does resemble a typical macro product but wrapped up in a fancy label. Thereís not a whole lot of flavor in this, although it might be preferable to regular Budweiser.
leah2974 (445) - Georgia, USA - APR 3, 2012
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
Better than other Buds but not a good ale. Slightly bittersweet, cheap taste, watered down, little depth of flavor.
joshj2176 (103) - California, USA - MAR 9, 2012
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Reddish copper color with hues of orange. The nose is low on power...mostly toasted malt. The taste follows the nose...itís toasty and bready for the most part. Thin mouthfeel.
UDBeernut (1775) - Moving to Jax, Florida, USA - FEB 29, 2012
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Had on tap, poured into pint glass
a: clear amber color with a foamy 1/2" head that reduces quicly. Light carbonation
s: not too much aroma, what is there is malt
t: sweet malts, balanced with slight earthy hops. I would have liked a little more hop bitterness, but not bad that most of the masses should like
Brandon1989 (240) - Euless, Texas, USA - FEB 18, 2012
2.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
poured from a bottle. the appearance is a light red amber and the head surprisingly stuck around. the smell is hoppy and the taste is very bad. tastes very bitter with a tiny bitterness and yeast. overall itís a very bad beer that i would not recommend.