firemarshal (203) - North Carolina, USA - NOV 11, 2013
3.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
I’m not going to give this the AATPO treatment. What I am going to say is I love my home made beer, I love craft beer, and I also love this beer from AB. I can’t and won’t hate this beer just bc it’s from a macro.
Rrauth (1196) - North Carolina, USA - NOV 8, 2013
2.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Bottle. Thx Jason. Ok I'm wasted but this isn't bad. After moonshine and lots if beer it still has character nice.
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
redneckpride (11) - New Hampshire, USA - NOV 4, 2013
3.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
For a macro, this is surprisingly good. Sweet and palatable, makes a smooth drink with your favorite meal. Quite excellent for a A.B. product. Bud clearly wants to keep its title of King of Beers. Definitely not a Bass ale, but certainly a respectable light-bodied brewskie.
Cirrhosis (1283) - Edmonton, Alberta, CANADA - NOV 4, 2013
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Ugggg lets give this a whirl...... try this since they’r out of new castle. Nice tulip pint glass. Amber body, limted skiff on top. Served so cold there is no aroma...... A long wait later, aroma is still mild, sweet, grainy, a hoppy chem, nothing bad or appealing. Taste is close to the same. Fake, banana, roast malts, chem, weird lightly harsh after taste. Bad beer
Mora2000 (6135) - McKinney, Texas, USA - NOV 3, 2013
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
Golden pour with a white head. The aroma has a lot of grain and not much else. The flavor is grain, sugar, toffee and a hint of orange. Medium mouthfeel and medium carbonation.
petewhitley (491) - Nagoya, JAPAN - NOV 3, 2013
2.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
(tasted under the label of "Batch #91406") ~This review was made some time ago via another application, and thus the specific details (beyond numerical scores) are no longer available~
JRHBrew (366) - Fredericton, New Brunswick, CANADA - NOV 2, 2013
3.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
I think is a great beer. I think if it was made by someone else people would really like it.
Bendrixian (1452) - Canadiana, Ontario, CANADA - OCT 31, 2013
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Purchased as a single bottle from the LCBO. Pours a clear coppery colour with white head that doesn’t last very long. Has a real apple puree aroma, with muted notes of roast, some brown sugar and lageryness. The beer lacks flavour. It has a yeasty banana note and overall this beer is terrible, although better than regular bud.
luttonm (3983) - Seattle, Washington, USA - OCT 26, 2013
2.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
12oz in Boston. Could be worse. Slightly rich, clear reddish lager. Apple juice. Whiff of Euro ’premium lager’, i.e. heavier malt bill. Sweet, alc swig. clean and mellow, clorny malt, banana yeast. not so tasty
brleo (78) - - OCT 23, 2013
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Not that I was expecting much, but this is disappointing. Advertised as though Budweiser just discovered the art of brewing beer, this really just tastes like a regular Bud with a little more pronounced flavor. The problem is, the pronounced flavor is not very good at all. Strong alcohol presence makes it taste more like an 8% abv beer than a 6%. Aroma is stunted and off-putting, smelling like malt liquor. Appearance is enticing with its amber/caramel colour, but the taste is not very good at all - alcoholic sweetness mixes with all the flavors of a standard Budweiser lager, but the alcohol masks the flavor of anything remotely good about this beer. Overall, I FAR prefer regular Budweiser to this.