junon (381) - Honolulu, Hawaii, USA - MAY 27, 2013
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
This is what their flagship should have tasted like all these years. However they need to quit with this "drinkability" nonsense. Who are they targeting with these new "craft" beers? If theyre trying to win over the beer geeks then they will fail to impress. If theyre trying to get the average beer drinker to open their palates up then this is a good beer to start. This beer has a score potential of at least 3...possibly higher with just a few more tweaks in the flavour direction. Drop the drinkability crap and just let the flavours shine. Overall I like it...certainly dont love it but its okay.
Bricktop86 (503) - Moore, Oklahoma, USA - MAY 26, 2013
2.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
This was better than I was expecting. No hop presence but you can taste the malts. Still has a lot of adjunct flavor though
thrust (2) - - MAY 20, 2013 does not count
1.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Black crown just has a bad taste. I guess if itís all you have then it will do. Try something else
LKT1983 (110) - Benton, Kentucky, USA - MAY 19, 2013
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Budís "Brewmasters" didnít deliver too much with their attempt at a more quality brew. Tasted like a heavier Bud, which is exactly what it is. Pretty lame, and sad that some people consider this quality.
eRock_2013 (141) - South Carolina, USA - MAY 19, 2013
3.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
My go-to macro beer, a safe restaurant default. My favorite in the budweiser family. A solid taste and full body with mild bitterness. The taste is bitter without being hoppy. Mixed bitter and malty taste is somewhat confusing, but at least gives the beer decent character for a macro.
---Rated via Beer Buddy
Ret12 (447) - Maryland, USA - MAY 17, 2013
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
I was really hoping that this would be something delicious but it is just a sub par beer that is made for the masses.
AbbeyRoade (244) - Missouri, USA - MAY 15, 2013
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Better than a Bud Light by a landslide, but still an American Lager and one that doesnít come close to what I would consider "craft" beer. Just a step ahead of the typical Bud corny, grainy, watery qualities with a bit more smoothness and drinkability. Only drink after a really hot/sweaty outing or exercise.
BeerHawk (1810) - Huntsville, Alabama, USA - MAY 12, 2013
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Bottle date 31JAN13. Poured amber with a quick off-white head. Very subdue to nonexistent aroma and flavor. Light body and a hint of a malt aftertaste. Bud will always be bud no matter what they try.
jb (2016) - Rochester, New York, USA - MAY 11, 2013
2.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Bottle at bobs. Dark clear gold. Grainy nose. Buttery palate. Pretty weak. Not good.
DiarmaidBHK (3125) - Pennsylvania, USA - MAY 11, 2013
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Bottle from Jessup plaza. Pours khaki with an Light brown foam. Not much on the nose except for a slight maltiness. Smooth on the tongue but not particularly flavorful. Very thin on the tongue Iím not sure Budweiser understands the whole craft beer thing.