j12601 (7350) - Poughkeepsie, New York, USA - MAR 3, 2013
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Bottle thrust upon us by blipp at James’ place for a tasting. Pours a piss clear gold with a thin white head. Sweet corn and grain. Flavors follow the nose, more sweet corn and grain. Not much going on.
dryhopped (4) - brimfield, Indiana, USA - MAR 3, 2013 does not count
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 4/20
pours a nice amber brown with a decent head. smells like regular Bud. malty sweet with a bit of caramel, but spoiled by the same odd Bud flavor at the end. it must be the beechwood they are strangely proud of.
phaleslu (7107) - Cincinnati, Ohio, USA - MAR 1, 2013
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Pour from a 12 oz. bottle during a promotion at Crown in downtown Indianapolis. Pours a clear gold color, a bit deeper than regular Bud, with a fizzy white head. Notes of sweet and caramel malts, crackers, dried sweet fruits, sugar, and a little grass. Light-bodied, but bigger than a regular Bud, with medium-high carbonation and a sweet, malty, dry mouthfeel. Not very good but probably better than Bud overall.
thechandler (577) - Charleston, West Virginia, USA - FEB 28, 2013
1.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Pour looks like a slightly darker Budweiser. Aroma is a slightly maltier Budweiser. Flavor is a slightly bolder Budweiser. Overall taste is just like a slightly better than Budweiser.
llbjr77 (89) - Largo, Florida, USA - FEB 28, 2013
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Was truly disappointed when first tasted this beer. It looked excellent and I thought Bud finally got one right. Taste was just not there and not one I will look for. Better than regular Bud, but still disappointing!
ExpendableHero (770) - Florida, USA - FEB 27, 2013
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Hazy golden beer with some orange accents. Thin, white head. Aromas are slightly woody and a bit skunky. Tastes of corn mash, some barley, tiny hints of caramel, and skunked beer. Some caramel malt in the finish makes this beer much better than regular Budweiser. Session beer and not terrible.
geologyguy (871) - Columbia, South Carolina, USA - FEB 23, 2013
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
UPDATED: NOV 27, 2013 halfway decent beer but not great.. definitely more flavor than a regular Budweiser...good slight Malt flavor x2
arventresca (567) - Charlotte, North Carolina, USA - FEB 23, 2013
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Meh.... Taste like bud light platinum. Very unimpressive. Though it does give you a nice shine.
BeerFunGuy (799) - California, USA - FEB 23, 2013
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bonus points for the higher alcohol percentage. It basically tastes just like Budweiser though.
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
bluejacket74 (1466) - Reynoldsburg, Ohio, USA - FEB 23, 2013
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
12 ounce bottle, born on date of September 30, 2012 (Julian Date 12273 stamped on label). This is labeled as Batch 91406. A buddy bought me some of the Project 12 beers since he found them on sale recently (bought the 12 pack for just $5.75), so I might as well try them. Served in a pint glass, the beer pours a clear amber color with about a half inch off-white head. Head retention is good, and there’s a decent amount of lacing. The brew smells like sweet and grainy malt, and some caramel. Taste is similar to the aroma, but there’s also the addition of some nuts. Mouthfeel/body is light/medium, with a good amount of carbonation. Truthfully, this is better than I expected it to be. Worth a try if you can pick up a single somewhere.