wnoble (1251) - Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA - FEB 7, 2013
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
This just pisses me off. This is some absolute crap. Thin and watery. Nose is fruity and a light malt aroma. God damnit. Sweet, muddy malty, waste of $1.67.
csaso (1661) - Missouri, USA - FEB 7, 2013
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Bottle - fair size foamy head, light gold color, very sweet malty aroma and flavor, some honey notes, a little too sweet for me
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
coolfunnj (323) - Margate City, New Jersey, USA - FEB 6, 2013
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
aroma like i remember michelob used to smell when i used to drink it..clear golden and slightly amber color with dissipating sudsy white head..im not trying to be a snob here but this tastes flat stale watery and unpleasant the sweetness just makes it worse,the hoppiness just an indistinguishable slight tingle.. someone will try this thinking this is what a craft beer tastes like and go right back to drinking budweiser,so its clever in a way..bad aftertaste and inappropriately low in carbonation..overall..id rather have a bud or michelob..you can do way better for 8 bucks
thome50 (1228) - Morro Bay via Orange County, California, USA - FEB 5, 2013
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Poured into Woodshop Tasting snifter. Pours a deep amber with white head. Aroma of grain, crown, slight plastic. Taste is more intense than regular Budweiser.
jsquire (3727) - St. Marys, Ohio, USA - FEB 5, 2013
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Deep amber color out of the bottle with a short lived white head. Thin malty nose with something chemical in it. Caramel corn sweetness with some earthy notes to it. Odd metallic finish. Better than Bud....
garrison (792) - Cin. city, Ohio, USA - FEB 5, 2013
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
I was golden hued, yeasty, sweet malty Bud with some bready followup taste... feh.
umich03jm (2712) - Flat Rock, Michigan, USA - FEB 3, 2013
1.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
Bottle. Bought for $1 on pure curiosity. Pours golden orange in color with a small bubbly head that quickly fades. Not much aroma, light sweet corn malt. Taste is just bad. It really just tastes like a slightly stronger budweiser which I hate. Light, artificial, sugary taste. Dry over-carbonated finish. Bad, just bad. Also, what makes this an amber lager? How are they able to sell this with amber on the label? Drain pour.
GandGKevin (932) - Virginia Beach, Virginia, USA - FEB 3, 2013
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 7/20
Not much in the way of aromas. Just a little malty note. Sweet malty flavors. Overall blah. If that was the winner, is hate to taste the other 11 entrants.
Blairgus (3179) - California, USA - FEB 3, 2013
2.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
3 Feb 2012, bottle. yellow, clear, some steady bubbles. nose is sweet budweiser malt with more amber malt and possibly a bit of alcohol. thin body and moderately fizzy. has the typical budweiser bitter hop bite, slight candy malt, maybe a bit of alcohol. itís not bad. itís a bit heavy to drink if you want a lager and itís not craft/tasty. so itís a 6% beer for people who like how budweiser tastes.
travita (4375) - Frisco, Texas, USA - FEB 3, 2013
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Bottle. The smell is sweet, floral, malt, hop, and eh. The look is golden in color, thin white head. The taste is clean, malt, floral, and ok.