robobeerbelly (73) - Wisconsin, USA - MAR 7, 2014
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
This beer is ranked in the 9th percentile. I dont think this beer is that bad but i wouldnt order it again. Im sure it will be discontinued soon.
blankboy (6572) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - MAR 6, 2014
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
[Bottle (341ml) shared with HogTownHarry, jercraigs & mabel -- c/o j&m] Pours a clear gold with an average size diminishing frothy off-white head. Aroma of sugar, toffee, caramel malt, grain, alcohol and fruit -- I donít know -- I know itís not good. Flavour of caramel malt, toffee and sugar -- itís sugary sweet -- along with a slightly dry finish. Average bodied. Not as bad as I expected it to be but itís not good regardless.
northropfrye (2768) - Steinbach, Manitoba, CANADA - MAR 2, 2014
2.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
UPDATED: MAR 4, 2014 Slight sweet malt and bubblegum aroma and flavour but really faint and nothing interesting going on here. Apple gross sweet taste. More crap from Budweiser.
HogTownHarry (6201) - Toronto (Harbourfront), Ontario, CANADA - FEB 28, 2014
2.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
12oz bottle shared by jercraigs & mabel with me and blankboy. Clear light amber, smallish white head. Aroma is VERY fruity, a little medicinal, some alcohol, maybe/kinda vaguely cereal grain and floral. Taste is even sweeter - a bit like the Hebrew beers watered down - not all that boozy. Sticky, flattish, quick finishing - ehh. Why?
ajnepple (3392) - Conifer, Colorado, USA - FEB 27, 2014
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
12 oz bottle from Evergreen Discount, "born" over 4 months ago. Light amber and clear with a small white head. Very mild aroma of toasted grains, pale malts, light hops and chemicals. Similar flavor, starting clean and malty and quickly moving to an unpleasant finish reminiscent of Budweiser. Average body, crisp with carbonation. No thanks.
Chad9976 (1417) - Albany, New York, USA - FEB 23, 2014
3.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
I poured a 16oz can into a lager glass. It was canned on 10/27/13 and cost $1.90 ($0.12 per ounce).
Appearance: Pretty copper/orange hue. Crystal clear with constant carbonation visible. Pours to an average sized, white, frothy head which retains and laces fairly well.
Smell: Faint hint of sweet malt, but otherwise totally generic macro lager aroma. No obvious adjunct distractions, though.
Taste: Budweiser has finally decided to make a "serious" lager with their new Black Crown brew. The recipe seems to be rather simple: one malt and four hops, yet the hops are not that prominent. What you really get is a stronger American version of an Oktoberfest as it has the usual flavors of toffee and caramel. Thereís some diacetyl here as well, imparting a movie popcorn butter-flavoring. This is definitely a much better beer than regular Budweiser, but still has a way to go to be truly crafty.
Up front thereís a distinct sweetness of caramel, toffee and butterscotch (though thatís probably diacetyl). It fades quickly and morphs into a general lager flavor with some faint dryness from the hops. Itís not especially bitter or hoppy despite the marketing hyperbole. Though the palette here is much cleaner and more authentic than your average fizzy yellow beer. The beechwood finishing really doesnít do much, except maybe impart some vanilla to accentuate the malt base. In the end, Budweiser Black Crown is a decent amber ale and a macro lager thatís more than just tolerable.
Drinkability: Thereís a definite difference to the mouthfeel and drinking process of this beer compared to others of the genre. The delivery is a little thicker, calmer and noticeably smoother overall. I might even call it refreshing for a moment there. Still, Iím not sure why Budweiser Black Crown needs to be 6% ABV, as it drinks and feels like something a tad more sessionable. At least thereís no alcohol presence.
paljoey (9) - - FEB 21, 2014 does not count
3 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Buddy brought this over to try. ...not bad for bud. The after taste is the same would drink another.
coyforce (676) - California, USA - FEB 15, 2014
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Not that terrible for a budweiser, but still has a slight flavor of skunkiness and a mass-produced flavor/aroma. Donít expect any bud to ever be "great" but I do hope that they continue to invest in smaller markets and better quality ingredients.
EithCubes (5238) - New Jersey, USA - FEB 14, 2014
0.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Bottle, born on 01OCT13, screw-top. Nose is sweet (candyish) and corny-floral. Taste is sweet but not cloying, no bitterness, moderately clean, corn-based with slight malt and little graininess. Medium body with a little heft, maybe even fullish; itís a little mealy, and overall bland and mostly still (and flabby, to boot). What elevates this above a malt liquor?
AgentAle (1072) - Alberta, CANADA - FEB 10, 2014
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Aroma : roasty malt and dough aroma. Some sulphur notes
Taste: roasted caramel flavors with a fairly bitter finish. Some apple sourness. Doesnít finish particularly pleasantly