56_units (1) - Merseyside, ENGLAND - FEB 14, 2016 does not count
4.7 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 19/20
I know you die hard if its not local its *rap brigade will hate this, but Bud 66 is just perfect for coming home to after a long slog of a day. Fresh, slightly sweet and refreshing, best taste of any light beer. Fantastic
eastkenttom (122) - herne bay, Kent, ENGLAND - AUG 29, 2015
1.2 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Normal Bud I can deal with but this is terrible piss water. Do not buy this grim stuff. 1/10.
weordie (874) - Tyne & Wear, ENGLAND - JUL 26, 2015
1.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
As fas as Bud goes this is actually drinkable, it would be my go to out of the mass produced rubbish lager world
Hartoloni (211) - - JUL 9, 2015
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Not really a pouring type beer, more of a drink it out the bottle at a BBQ beer. Not a lot on the nose bit earthy with a bit of tortilla chip. Not much to say except it is beer and on a hot day with mates looking for a cheap lager day it does just fine
SilverfoX (871) - Norfolk, ENGLAND - MAY 1, 2014
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
smells of nothing looks like stale pee tastes thin and watery, flavour of brown sugar mixed in water, bog standard better than some even so!
wheresthepath (2139) - Buckinghamshire, ENGLAND - JAN 11, 2014
0.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
UPDATED: JAN 12, 2014 [Bottle at Coast 2 Coast, Stevenage) Although most people love to hate it, I personally have no objections to the standard Budweiser. It?s crisp, clean and easy-drinking (albeit lacking in flavour) and is pretty refreshing on a hot day. I therefore thought a lower abv version would actually be a good idea, as you don?t necessarily want something as strong as a regular bud on a hot day. Unfortunately this was nothing like regular Bud. It pours a pale gold, but the thin white head vanishes almost immediately. There?s a very mild fizz, but this had died by the end leaving the beer flat. The beer is very bland and watery, with little taste other than mild soggy cardboard. It?s rubbish, makes me think of what the bad Sainsbury?s economy lager I tried last year would have been like if I?d have left it open overnight. Oh well, hopefully that will be my sole pale lager over and done with for the year!
DandyLion (518) - Leicester, Leicestershire, ENGLAND - DEC 6, 2013
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Bottle @ home. A peely-wally colour with little aroma. Taste of corn and corn sugars. Not very good really. What did I expect though?
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
jamesie1857 (1962) - Sheffield, South Yorkshire, ENGLAND - AUG 30, 2013
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
330ml bottle from Tesco - Piss yellow, no head. Nose is sweet and grainy. Taste is just sweet. Sickly and sugary. Nondescript palate. Ideal for the BBQ crowd.
ManVsBeer (8772) - Hebden Bridge, West Yorkshire, ENGLAND - JUL 30, 2013
2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Light golden coloured clear lager. Holds little taste but not the worst body which is fairly crisp.
altonbrownd (5770) - Chevy Chase, Maryland, USA - MAY 7, 2013
1.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Bottle at St. Pancrass station. Golden body with thin to medium head. Nose is corny, hops, some malts. Pretty basic taste of corn and malts. Not much to it. Watery texture. Sweet, dank and funky finish.