SDbruboy (1864) - San Diego, California, USA - MAY 22, 2003
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
UPDATED: JUL 2, 2003 (Note 6/20/03: I tried this again on draft at a bar in Berlin - interestingly enough my scoring was almost exactly the same...) Light premium lager - I guess that it's just the style I'm not so fond of... That said, this Czechvar had the beautiful classic lager golden color and a rapidly dissipating white head with no lacing to speak of. Moderate aroma, malty with generous hops - orange and a bit of perfume. Well done, but still typical lager flavor - definitely better than the other mass produced "Budweiser". For me this would be best with a light lunch on a hot day, rather than featured for an evening tasting. Drinkable, but give me my ales please!
hotstuff (4058) - Indiana, USA - MAY 22, 2003
3.3 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
This brew had a quick dissolving head with no lacing on the sides of my mug. The carbonation could be seen rising to the top. The body was gold. It had a fruity sweet aroma to me. There was an aftertaste with this brew.
Admiral (524) - Schnecksville, Pennsylvania, USA - MAY 21, 2003
3.7 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
Gold, with white head and some lacing. Quite malty, with some grassiness and bitterness from what are probably Saaz hops. Very satisfying.
thedm (4927) - Fort Wayne, USA - MAY 21, 2003
3.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
UPDATED: JUN 4, 2003 This brew poured a medium head of fine white bubbles and a transparent light orange colored body with carbonation rising up the sides on the mug. It has a mild hop aroma with the flavor of a lager and its head left little lacing. The taste of this beer is not bad and not great. I could taste notes of chewy hops and some acidic bitterness in its finish.
Gusler (2653) - Tucson, Arizona, USA - MAY 16, 2003
3.5 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Well its been a real longtime since I’ve had a Budweiser Budvar, and my notes are quite favorable, but that was before I became a “Beer Geek”, and truly developed my love for dark strong ales.
The archetypal limpid golden pilsner color, the head brilliant white, moderate in size and frothy in structure, the lace adequate, prototypical pilsner nose, all malt and lightly sweet, fresh and clean, start is malt and somewhat sweet, top is skeletal in its feel. Finish is potently acidic, the hops pleasant in their spicy bite, dry aftertaste, a fair to middling beer, good as its 100 degrees Fahrenheit today, and will remain so till mid October, so these “Clean and Crisp” beers do hit the “B” Spot.
loweredsixth (946) - Clovis, California, USA - MAY 15, 2003
2.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Plae yellow color with a large rocky white head. The aroma is perfumey with some very subtle spiciness from the hops. The flavor was rather bland...watery...some hops, perfumey. Typical pilsner characteristics. I'm not really impressed.
Sully (1377) - Potts Point, New South Wales, AUSTRALIA - MAY 15, 2003
3.8 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
How dare the
Czechvar be in brackets to appease that mongrel beer empire? Should we have truth in advertising and call it Notweaklikethekingofpissvar? Anyway, it is a lovely soft Pils from a country that knows how to do it. Not as strident as
Pilsner Urquell but nevertheless a great beer.
foduck (330) - Denton, Texas, USA - MAY 11, 2003
3.6 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
A decent pilsener but falls a hair short of being as good as Urquell. The normal pilsener flavors are here, light malts, spicy hops. Looks great though.
crazyvin (1911) - New York, USA - MAY 5, 2003
3.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 15/20
drank from bottle, could not distingish aroma. I really enjoyed this beer its flower-sweet taste want down smooth and balanced well with a subtle hoppy finish.
Spiesy (2338) - Sydney, Greater London, AUSTRALIA - MAY 3, 2003
2.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
Bottled. This is a nice enough beer and compared to the other Bud, it tastes down right amazing but I do think we need to get a handle on the ratings. Its good but its not great. Its got more flavour and a strong bitter finish then most, but lacks finesses and some depth.