madquacker (1099) - Canberra ACT, AUSTRALIA - FEB 19, 2005
3.8 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
A spectacularly simple beer. It is so right. Probbaly my favourite standard beer.
Nekronos (3967) - Xalapa, MEXICO - FEB 12, 2005
3.4 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
UPDATED: FEB 1, 2006 Pretty much better than the USA BudWeiser, but it is also too soft, and I will not consider it over a Coke if I am thirsty and I have both options. BUt it was quite cool for heat.
stringtheory (4) - woodinville, Washington, USA - FEB 11, 2005 does not count
3.9 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
Well i’m not going to analyze this beer like it was someone’s gown at the oscars but I will say that it is one of my favorite easy drinking beers. Too refreshing on a warm day to hate on.
BobBarley (12) - CANADA - FEB 9, 2005
3.9 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
A good beer. It is sometimes dismissed by beer snobs as just another good light coloured lager. There are other good light coloured lagers? With actual flavour? In my limited experience, I haven’t really found any other lagers, pilsners, anyway, that taste like hops and malted barley in addition to actually being delicious. If there were more widely available pilsner with strong and pleasant flavour, I might be less generous, but for me, this beer occupies a very essential niche by itself. I am not very experienced with pilsners, but I don’t see how much potential they have to be better. Very good beer in a limited style.
jus10cider82 (67) - Wichita, Kansas, USA - FEB 3, 2005
2.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
medium head that stays for awhile..basic gold in color...smells a little funky...but not all that bad just nothing exciting
green (186) - Boston, Massachusetts, USA - FEB 3, 2005
3.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
Oh, if this were the working class afte-r a-hard-days-work beer in America rather than the rancid swill that bares it’s true name here! Not a "holy-crap" kind of beer, but nice. Actually kept a head, mild in flavor, nicely balanced.
ChrisPants (317) - Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA - JAN 29, 2005
2.6 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
The american import version of Budvar, the Czech original of Budweiser. The history is complex, but the flavor is not. Crisp slightly hopped slightly funked pilsner, medium straw-colored. Clean, crisp finish, slightly pleasant session-beer sour twang to aftertaste.
Ray1975 (251) - Broken Arrow, Oklahoma, USA - JAN 28, 2005
3.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
poured a golden color with little to no head. Aroma is all skunk.. Which is not all that bad.. Taste is a bit of malty sweetness with a skunky add. Nice medium bitter finish.. If US bud tasted like this I would probably buy it..
elektrogeist (158) - Las Vegas, Nevada, USA - JAN 24, 2005
2.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Every time I get this stuff, it’s always totally skunked due to the bottle non-coloring. When, OH WHEN, will those silly eastern europeans take the hint? Pretty awful from the bottle, but I’d like to try it on tap to see if it tastes better without the intense skunk stink and taste. And usually by the time it gets here and sits around, the taste starts to resemble urine.
Garrat (1325) - Suffolk, ENGLAND - JAN 24, 2005
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
From A Bottle.Light orange in colour small head,light hop aroma,some malt and fizzy sweetness.