OKplus (787) - Oklahoma, USA - MAY 13, 2013
2.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
A - Pours a brilliantly clear golden brass color with 1 1.5 finger white head that melts into nothing.
S - Sweet grain, apple, mild grassy hops, clean yeast.
T - Sweet malt, corn, mild dry grass hops, a touch of lemon on the sides of the tongue.
M - Low carbonation, slick, flat finish.
Not sure how old this is. Overall less than expected. The low carbonation and finish was a let down. I would love to try this on tap in Prague.
Serving type: bottle
WillMase (5) - Colchester, Essex, ENGLAND - JUN 2, 2015 does not count
3.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
Bottled from Supermarket. Not much smell to it, smells bready with a bit of grass. Beauitful clear pale honey colour with a nice white head. Crisp light sweet medium bitter taste. Light body, thin texture, lively carbonation, and abrupt finish. A very crisp, very drinkable lager that has that something more to it than your standard crap.
jcwattsrugger (11374) - Florida and, New Jersey, USA - JUN 1, 2015
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
12oz bottle. Disappearing white-gold. A-sweet lt malt. T-sweet honey/sugar-lt malt, some spice hops.
caribou43 (59) - SWITZERLAND - MAY 31, 2015
3.4 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
This beer is becoming too industrial. Of course it is better than a poor heineken and it is still a pils but a bit to sweet for me. The colour is nice like gold and the carbonation is regular. My biggest critic is that they cut the quality of hop, if I compare with this product 15 years ago.
ibud2020 (1) - Texas, USA - MAY 31, 2015 does not count
3.9 AROMA 9/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 10/20
I am rather shocked, that website specializing in rating beer and collecting opinion worldwide can’t even do its own home work. This beer is celebrating 120 years of brewing this year! NOT 720 YEARS AS YOR ARTICLE STATES RIGHT UPFRONT!!! The % alcohol by volume is 5.
Therefore the PROOF is 10 not 12 as stated. Your description sucks my friends!
StevieT (927) - AUSTRALIA - MAY 29, 2015
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
From a bottle. Not my favourite style, malty and well balanced, smooth and drinkable.
UjoKlobasa (9) - - MAY 27, 2015 does not count
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
Bottle. Distinct aroma (saaz hops, grain) from other pilseners. Light yellowish color, clear, watery look. Medium bitterness. Good pilsener.
Fisler (160) - GERMANY - MAY 24, 2015
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
Im Glas schöne, lang anhaltende Perligkeit, in der Nase malzig, etwas maischig. Im Trunk ausgewogen malzig-bitter. Wenig Abgang - gutes Pils.
rayaron (613) - Kfar Saba, ISRAEL - MAY 23, 2015
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Bottle 0.5l. Clear light golden with small white head. Sweetish aroma with notes of honey and some herbs. Clean and sweetish flavor, floral, somewhat sugary, notes of herbs and honey, light sourness and light bitterness. Soft carbonation, light-bodied.
ston3s42 (33) - - MAY 19, 2015
3.3 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 13/20
UPDATED: MAY 20, 2015 Light golden appearance with little head. Tastes of honey, citrus strong malts and is relatively complex to be a larger
Roger60 (91) - - MAY 14, 2015
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 11/20
SB Lund, flaska. En bra pilsner. Trots flaskans resa genom Sauronbolagets varma ljusa sataniska trista lokaler.