RateBeer
overall
12
26
style

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

distribution
unknown

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 109   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.47   SEASONAL: Special   EST. CALORIES: 180   ABV: 6%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
The beer was first brewed in St. Louis by brewmaster Jim Bicklein and was developed in collaboration with brewmaster Katie Rippel from Fort Collins, Colo. “The original Budweiser brewery is, of course, here in St. Louis, so we wanted to honor our brewing heritage with a beer that uses ingredients that German immigrants, like our founder Adolphus Busch, would have used when they came to the United States,” Bicklein said. “In this pilsner we use the same types of Hallertau and Tettnang hops commonly used in St. Louis during the late 1800s.”


1.8
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 5/20
tnkw01 (1363) - Knoxville, Tennessee, USA - JAN 22, 2013
Bottle. Ok, taste like regular Bud, just not as watery. Pale color. Some head. Aroma, regular Bud.

1.2
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 3/20
awnr163 (1) - Houston, Texas, USA - JAN 21, 2013 does not count
Very disappointed in overall taste, but appearance and smell were pleasant. Almost a white bread aroma with a subtle hint of fruit. The right of amount of proper hops were lacking to give it optimum balance. Overall, I call it a smooth malt liquor at best.

2.4
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 8/20
Oscbert (1155) - Sacramento, California, USA - JAN 20, 2013
Sour hay and green apple aroma. Smells like bud light Pours brilliantly clear light golden color with lasting white head Sweet bready flavor with light spicy hops in background. Medium bodied with medium high co2 sweet lingering finish My least favorite of the Budweiser batch series. Needs more hops. It is very sweet and some more noble hops might really help balance this beer out ---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone

1.8
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 5/20
PhillyBeer2112 (2655) - Oviedo, Florida, USA - JAN 19, 2013
Disappointing start. Wanted a spicy noble hop nose and got nothing at all. The beer is almost odorless, and I’m a bit stymied. At most it smells like a slice of white bread. The label was correct with the color, deep gold. Head faded fast in the fluted pilsner glass. Malts are sweet and grainy, there’s a bit of hop bitterness at the finish, a little spicy leafy somewhere in the flavor, but its barely present, just enough to keep this from tasting like a malt liquor, which is basically what the malts come through like. Yes, its feels like a slightly cleaner version of a malt liquor, with slightly more hops to boot. Finishable but otherwise a real let down.

3.2
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 13/20
TheBeerGod (5598) - Newport News, Virginia, USA - JAN 19, 2013
Bottle courtesy of my friend Noel - thanks! Aroma is fruity and sweet with bread, toasted malt and light grass. Taste is sweet malt, toasted grains, light fruit, light grass and dough. Body is medium with a soft creamy carbonation. Ends with more dough, sweet malt, toasted grains and light grass.

2.3
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 12/20
gsmitty80 (2028) - Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA - JAN 18, 2013
Least favorite of the three. Really not a true pilsener. Didnt have much of anything and just tasted like regular skunky swag.

1.5
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 1/20
dp (608) - uniontown, Ohio, USA - JAN 16, 2013
bread, dough, pale, clear, can not offer a taste for this, pbetter than plain?light body, average carbonation, not bad but not going anywhere soon

2.9
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 12/20
Lemke10 (906) - Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA - JAN 15, 2013
This pours a clear, light amber color with a fast diminishing head. There is a slight grain scent. The taste is crisp, clean, and refreshing. Its taste is fairly simple that leaves a slight grainy after taste with some hints of lemon zest.

2.9
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 13/20
cheap (4629) - Beaver Valley, Beaver County, Pennsylvania, USA - JAN 11, 2013
You can tell that bud put a lot of effort into trying not to insult anybody with these special brew.Yes, easy to drink but a little sharper than the 23185 which was sharper than the 91406 so I guess this makes it the one with the most personality. Never over the top on all three. Just a simple pale yellow beer with a nice creamy head, all three of these had creamy heads. OK all gone and not bad. Never sharp or nasty like so many astringent craft brew pilsner wanna bees.

2.5
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 10/20
nuplastikk (5095) - Madison, Wisconsin, USA - JAN 11, 2013
12oz bottle. I don’t know why you’d want to make a 6% Pilsener. Pale, soulless orange-tan. Odd snaky carbonation bubbles. Thin, oily head. Dulled malt aroma, not offensive, not enticing. Really fails to capture the zest and crispness of a Pils. Too sweet and malty, makes you wonder what they were thinking. Better than regular Budweiser, but had some corny factory action going on for sure. Bullshit.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 2 3  4  5 6 7 8 9 10 11


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2015,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50