PhillyBeer2112 (2521) - Oviedo, Florida, USA - JAN 19, 2013
1.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
Disappointing start. Wanted a spicy noble hop nose and got nothing at all. The beer is almost odorless, and I’m a bit stymied. At most it smells like a slice of white bread. The label was correct with the color, deep gold. Head faded fast in the fluted pilsner glass. Malts are sweet and grainy, there’s a bit of hop bitterness at the finish, a little spicy leafy somewhere in the flavor, but its barely present, just enough to keep this from tasting like a malt liquor, which is basically what the malts come through like. Yes, its feels like a slightly cleaner version of a malt liquor, with slightly more hops to boot. Finishable but otherwise a real let down.
TheBeerGod (5218) - Newport News, Virginia, USA - JAN 19, 2013
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Bottle courtesy of my friend Noel - thanks! Aroma is fruity and sweet with bread, toasted malt and light grass. Taste is sweet malt, toasted grains, light fruit, light grass and dough. Body is medium with a soft creamy carbonation. Ends with more dough, sweet malt, toasted grains and light grass.
gsmitty80 (1794) - Washington DC, USA - JAN 18, 2013
2.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Least favorite of the three. Really not a true pilsener. Didnt have much of anything and just tasted like regular skunky swag.
dp (608) - uniontown, Ohio, USA - JAN 16, 2013
1.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 1/20
bread, dough, pale, clear, can not offer a taste for this, pbetter than plain?light body, average carbonation, not bad but not going anywhere soon
Lemke10 (767) - Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA - JAN 15, 2013
2.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
This pours a clear, light amber color with a fast diminishing head. There is a slight grain scent. The taste is crisp, clean, and refreshing. Its taste is fairly simple that leaves a slight grainy after taste with some hints of lemon zest.
cheap (4002) - Beaver Valley, Beaver County, Pennsylvania, USA - JAN 11, 2013
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
You can tell that bud put a lot of effort into trying not to insult anybody with these special brew.Yes, easy to drink but a little sharper than the 23185 which was sharper than the 91406 so I guess this makes it the one with the most personality. Never over the top on all three. Just a simple pale yellow beer with a nice creamy head, all three of these had creamy heads. OK all gone and not bad. Never sharp or nasty like so many astringent craft brew pilsner wanna bees.
nuplastikk (4321) - Madison, Wisconsin, USA - JAN 11, 2013
2.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
12oz bottle. I don’t know why you’d want to make a 6% Pilsener. Pale, soulless orange-tan. Odd snaky carbonation bubbles. Thin, oily head. Dulled malt aroma, not offensive, not enticing. Really fails to capture the zest and crispness of a Pils. Too sweet and malty, makes you wonder what they were thinking. Better than regular Budweiser, but had some corny factory action going on for sure. Bullshit.
ronaldtheriot (1219) - Laplace, Louisiana, USA - JAN 10, 2013
3.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
Budweiser Batch No. 63118 has a thick, creamy, off-white head, lot of thin lacing left on the glass, a clear, reddish-gold appearance, and a good amount of streaming bubbles in the beer. The aroma is subdued, but one can detect light, sweet grains and fruit (think of apricot). The taste is also very fruity (one wonders if fruit is not, in fact, added to the beer), with white bread crust, sweet grain, light brown sugar, and a slight hop bite at the end. Mouthfeel is light to medium, and Budweiser Batch No. 63118 finishes crisp, refreshing, and not too dry. Drinkability is high with this one, and not much alcohol is detected, except in the back of the throat after a few sips. Overall, this is another interesting offering from InBev. RJT
coldbrewky (1419) - Hippetown East, New York, USA - JAN 10, 2013
2.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
Hmmmm. Bottle via Ralf and Andrea. Deep golden pilsener. Now you know I do love bohemian Pilsener. This is not one of them. Overall it tastes like an old dog not truly wanting to try new tricks. Maltier and fuller than ordinary Bud. Thin hop presence. Overall a variant of a cheap canned euro lager/pilsener such as Branik or Lech.
jgb9348 (4689) - Arlington (Pentagon City), Virginia, USA - JAN 7, 2013
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Golden coloured body with a thick, five centimetre tall just off-white head. Aroma of pale malt, alcohol, cardboard, rice and not much at all - pretty bad. Light-bodied; Subtle malt note with some cardboard and grain right behind, a hint of alcohol and some rice, malt and basementy flavours. Aftertaste shows a dull maltiness with absolutely nothing else worthwhile. Overall, a pretty poor offering, worse than the other one I had from this series so far, and not worth buying - nothing interesting here. I sampled this twelve ounce bottle purchased from Liqour Outlet in Boonton, New Jersey on 12-December-2012 for US$0.98 sampled at home in Washington on 07-January-2013.