Prometheus (97), Fayetteville, North Carolina, USA
Oct 26, 2009 Better than Bud Light.
Light yellow color, no head.
Would drink over Bud Lgith any day, I suppose?
 1010 (206), Marysville, Ohio, USA
Oct 19, 2009 Taste just like Bud/Bud Light and any other macro beer. Would never pay money for this one.
beercamel (81), Chicago, Illinois, USA
Oct 15, 2009 I really dont know what the select means a joke I guess, because if this is the beer you selected the laughs on you brother.
Bonster (81), Jersey Shore, New Jersey, USA
Oct 2, 2009 I don’t think I can add anything enlightening about this beer. Not the worst I’ve ever had but it’s far from good.
iabeerguy (158), Iowa, USA
Sep 28, 2009 Not much going on with this beer. Pale yellow color, not much head and the same light beer taste, hop water. Still shocks me how many people say these types of beers are their "favorite".
CitizenZ (18), Kansas, USA
Sep 19, 2009 For only 99 calories, a good alcoholic drink. As a beer, its a lousy draft. Light amber pour, minimal head dissolves very quickly leaving no lacing. Watery, second press malt flavor, no follow through, no complexity, its pretty much just carbonation and malt. My preferred "light" beer (less than 112 calories), not a "good" beer by any means.
kaladims (13), Texas, USA
Sep 16, 2009 this beer is good for a cheap night out never going to drink more then one
Fratto (670), Arlington, Texas, USA
Sep 13, 2009 This is the very best of the bad, cheap lagers. If I can only afford a Bud, it’s a Bud Select.
|
View Statistics
