1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20 brettpace (176) - New York City, New York, USA - MAR 23, 2007
Not all its cracked up to be. Marketed to the LAte 20 something crowd, it leaves much to be desired. I guess people feel lie they are getting a superior product, I disagree... In act I prefer bud light...
0.9 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20 brianjames1 (540) - Northridge, California, USA - MAR 22, 2007
Yuck! Taste like mineral water. If I was watching my "carbs" i would rather drink my spit than this crap!
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20 cantchangeit (39) - Oregon, USA - MAR 22, 2007
alright honestly this is what is known as a extra light beer... so for what it is its okay.... I mean it tastes like a natural light or a keystone light maybe even a bud light if you wish... It looks like all those beers smells like all those beers and belongs in the one percentile of ratebeer.com. i purchased 24 twelve ounce bottles today for 12.99 plus tax and had a pleasant beer drinking experience... this beer isn’t one of the best selling beers in America because Americans have horrible beer taste... it is one of the best selling beers in America because Americans are fat.
2.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20 waldosk8tr (8) - , California, USA - MAR 21, 2007 does not count
Very similar to Bud, more bitter, same aroma and very similar flavor, I do not see the coparison to micros, must keep trying brew
0.6 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20 emerica56 (600) - Bristol, Rhode Island, USA - MAR 20, 2007
This beer has a very fizzy yet unappealing flavor to it. there pretty much is no flavor at all which is kind f sad when it is one of the most popular beers in america for slaes and mas appeal. It should probally be removed form liquior stores every where because of its lame attempt to be a flavorful beer
0.6 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20 EKGoldings (487) - Radford, Virginia, USA - MAR 10, 2007
Uh .... not much taste to speak of, but it is inoffensive.. other than the lack of character I mean. At least it isn’t metallic or tasting of festering pools of stewed corn.
0.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20 ilovedarkbeer (1864) - Abilene, Texas, USA - MAR 1, 2007
I dunno how they got rid of the aftertastes, or why. Very weird not to taste a beer when you are done with it. I can’t think of anything really good to say.
1.2 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20 Glennlikesbeer (16) - USA - MAR 1, 2007
Dude, they took the crappiest beer of all time and took away the afertaste, which was the only thing that lets you know its beer. It is positively piss.
|