Reid (2095) - Salem, Oregon, USA - MAR 5, 2005
0.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
Ok new beer from the "Evil Empire"..lets see ..
Appearance ..well the usual urine colour of someone slightly dehydrated from a night on the town...no head..just spittle like lace.
Smell..of rice pudding not beer.
Taste? tastes like seltzer water ,with rice and cardboard.
mouthfeel is miserable..limp and rotten finishes with a wimper.
No waywould I buy more of this..usual low carb crap. Doesnt A-B know the low carb frenzy is almost over. I dont see the point in this beer they alreadyhave the abysmal Mich.Ultra..drank everywere by obese idiots with their plate of grease.
aspidites (1272) - manteca, California, USA - MAR 4, 2005
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
no taste no nose no character no anything. water is more complex and tastes better.
beerguzzler (31) - Louisiana, USA - MAR 4, 2005
0.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
just got done drinking a 22 0z. of this horse piss.....have those bud people gone nucking futs or what......has the worst metallic aftertase .....dont waste your money on this
Aurelius (4709) - Tallahassee, Florida, USA - MAR 4, 2005
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Next to nothing. Pithy, bland aroma. Not distasteful, but woefully bland. It’s like Bud without hops.
Skrip99 (82) - Los Angeles, California, USA - MAR 3, 2005
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Wow, Bud’s answer to Michelob’s successful Ultra. If you are a healthnut or are watching you’re calories, then now you have another choice besides Ultra & Aspen. But I find of the three, this is the worst.
Cornfield (5570) - Oak Forest, Illinois, USA - MAR 2, 2005
0.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
I don’t see the point to A-B making this "beer." It’s just Bud’s weakest sister. Ugly urine yellow with a sweaty armpit stench, this has a sweet corn flavor and is virtually hopless. And hopeless. At least the sweet metallic finish is pretty weak.
BuckNaked (1230) - Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA - MAR 2, 2005
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 4/20
Bottle: Thanks to the locals at the Grey Lodge for sending this one over as a joke....guess they thought I wouldn’t rate it. Pours like water with pale yellow food coloring. Aroma is mild grass (hops!). Flavor is sweet grains, corn, light hops. Quite honestly this was better than I expected, and you really can get just a hint of hops here.
changxao (104) - South Carolina, USA - MAR 1, 2005
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
I didn’t know what this was when I bought it, but when I drank it, I thought, "hmmm bud light light". Now it is apparent that this is competition to Miller Lite. Not much to say, just thin, carbonated, and light in color and flavor. Drinkable, just not too good.
crzybob77 (530) - Richmond, Virginia, USA - MAR 1, 2005
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Hard to describe something with no flavor to rate. I guess this is their competition with miller lite.
Slick (1969) - Thief River Falls, Minnesota, USA - MAR 1, 2005
1.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Decent pale golden color,small white head that faded quickly leaving little behind.The aroma was faintly malty with a bit of hops in the background,and fairly decently carbonated.The taste was another thing all together.Watery thin malt some adjuncts and just a very faint hint of hops in the end and the only thing really happening in this beer is the Carbonation which helps the beer keep going but to where i no not.if you can find a single of this it’s worth trying atleast once but if you have to buy more then that i’d wait until someone else buys it then mooch one off of them.