Slick (1969) - Thief River Falls, Minnesota, USA - MAR 1, 2005
1.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Decent pale golden color,small white head that faded quickly leaving little behind.The aroma was faintly malty with a bit of hops in the background,and fairly decently carbonated.The taste was another thing all together.Watery thin malt some adjuncts and just a very faint hint of hops in the end and the only thing really happening in this beer is the Carbonation which helps the beer keep going but to where i no not.if you can find a single of this itís worth trying atleast once but if you have to buy more then that iíd wait until someone else buys it then mooch one off of them.
wilkie (1208) - Raleigh, North Carolina, USA - MAR 1, 2005
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Bottle. What a fucking joke. Is this Budís attempt at the South beach beer
drinker? Pale, tasteless, and Just downright nasty. I thought it was just a new
marketing scheme for bud until I asked a friend. Pisses me off.
BŁckDich (5464) - McCall, Idaho, USA - FEB 28, 2005
0.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
I could try to think up something witty about this to describe it but itís really not even worth it. Itís watery, pale and full of rice nose and flavor, less of a finish than drinking water. The rice is all that jumps up. If it werenít for the carbonation and the watery finish Iíd think this was watered down geikkekan.
hopdog (8773) - Lansdale, Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 28, 2005
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
UPDATED: MAR 1, 2005 After drinking and writing notes on 24 beers (hit up the Sly Fox then Victory then the Philly Gathering), what better way than to end it with this? Very weak aromas and tastes. Lightly sweet. Watery body.
JFGrind (1833) - Glenside, Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 28, 2005
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
One of the regulars at my local watering hole works for a Budweiser distributor. He was given a free six pack and brought it down the bar for light beer drinkers to sample. Two weeks later there was still two bottles left. Nobody wanted to try it. Not even for free. Popping the cap the beer gave off the aroma of a wet rag. Slight lacing of the glass during the sample. Chemical taste and a sweet finish. Iíd rather have a cider or even a B to the E over Bud Select.
turbo (1271) - Arizona, USA - FEB 27, 2005
1.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Poured yellow with a decent head.
Aroma and flavor of corn with a metalic taste on the palate.
Average beer with not much flavor.
kms399 (267) - plymouth, Minnesota, USA - FEB 27, 2005
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
some ass brought this into my home. after watchig him drink six of these i had to try one. just as i thought nasty. supprised they call this beer.
Shag (2584) - Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA - FEB 26, 2005
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
I guess Michelob Ultraís appeal is dying. But then again I thought the Atkins low carb fad was losing steam as well. Well it the midst of it all here comes this. I thought Bud Light was THIS. Well on to the beer. Trasparent yellow color with a cooked corn smell. It has no flavor whatsoever. It tastes like water. Maybe a little better than bud light, maybe?
TravelByBob (15) - Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 26, 2005
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Average is about the best word I can use to describe this beer. I am such a sucker for new beers and when I saw it on sale I had to buy it. The flavor is crisp & leaves little or no after-taste. If Budweiser is going to market this as a Low-Carb Beer they may have nailed it as it is better than any other. I would order this beer at a bar as it is easy to drink & does have a smooth flavor.
BrockLanders (771) - Panama City, Florida, USA - FEB 26, 2005
0.7 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
Whatís a day without a little AB bashing. I walked into the Class VI store on base Friday and the manager said, "Iíve got a new one...itís great...better than Miller or Coors lite..". Ok, I think Iíd be impressed. My buddy was so he bought a sixer. So how does the new AB lager fair.......surprise!!---it stinks. Good Lord folks, some people just donít get it. How could anyone who taste tested this for AB prior to its release say it was anything other than bland, listless, and otherwise poor? I know by definition you donít have to have hops to make beer, but gee whiz they couldíve thrown in a little. What a sad state the King of Beers has sunk to....and I donít mean Mizzou.