BuckNaked (1230) - Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA - MAR 2, 2005
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 4/20
Bottle: Thanks to the locals at the Grey Lodge for sending this one over as a joke....guess they thought I wouldn’t rate it. Pours like water with pale yellow food coloring. Aroma is mild grass (hops!). Flavor is sweet grains, corn, light hops. Quite honestly this was better than I expected, and you really can get just a hint of hops here.
changxao (104) - South Carolina, USA - MAR 1, 2005
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
I didn’t know what this was when I bought it, but when I drank it, I thought, "hmmm bud light light". Now it is apparent that this is competition to Miller Lite. Not much to say, just thin, carbonated, and light in color and flavor. Drinkable, just not too good.
crzybob77 (530) - Richmond, Virginia, USA - MAR 1, 2005
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Hard to describe something with no flavor to rate. I guess this is their competition with miller lite.
Slick (1969) - Thief River Falls, Minnesota, USA - MAR 1, 2005
1.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Decent pale golden color,small white head that faded quickly leaving little behind.The aroma was faintly malty with a bit of hops in the background,and fairly decently carbonated.The taste was another thing all together.Watery thin malt some adjuncts and just a very faint hint of hops in the end and the only thing really happening in this beer is the Carbonation which helps the beer keep going but to where i no not.if you can find a single of this it’s worth trying atleast once but if you have to buy more then that i’d wait until someone else buys it then mooch one off of them.
wilkie (1208) - Raleigh, North Carolina, USA - MAR 1, 2005
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Bottle. What a fucking joke. Is this Bud’s attempt at the South beach beer
drinker? Pale, tasteless, and Just downright nasty. I thought it was just a new
marketing scheme for bud until I asked a friend. Pisses me off.
BückDich (5464) - McCall, Idaho, USA - FEB 28, 2005
0.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
I could try to think up something witty about this to describe it but it’s really not even worth it. It’s watery, pale and full of rice nose and flavor, less of a finish than drinking water. The rice is all that jumps up. If it weren’t for the carbonation and the watery finish I’d think this was watered down geikkekan.
hopdog (9189) - Lansdale, Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 28, 2005
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
UPDATED: MAR 1, 2005 After drinking and writing notes on 24 beers (hit up the Sly Fox then Victory then the Philly Gathering), what better way than to end it with this? Very weak aromas and tastes. Lightly sweet. Watery body.
JFGrind (1860) - Glenside, Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 28, 2005
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
One of the regulars at my local watering hole works for a Budweiser distributor. He was given a free six pack and brought it down the bar for light beer drinkers to sample. Two weeks later there was still two bottles left. Nobody wanted to try it. Not even for free. Popping the cap the beer gave off the aroma of a wet rag. Slight lacing of the glass during the sample. Chemical taste and a sweet finish. I’d rather have a cider or even a B to the E over Bud Select.
turbo (1271) - Arizona, USA - FEB 27, 2005
1.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Poured yellow with a decent head.
Aroma and flavor of corn with a metalic taste on the palate.
Average beer with not much flavor.
kms399 (267) - plymouth, Minnesota, USA - FEB 27, 2005
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
some ass brought this into my home. after watchig him drink six of these i had to try one. just as i thought nasty. supprised they call this beer.