mattduling (64) - Fairmont, West Virginia, USA - AUG 6, 2008
1.3 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Who is Bud kidding, we all know that this is just Bud Light in a jazzed up bottle.
willisread (2170) - Tokyo, JAPAN - JUN 10, 2016
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Backlog. Pretty similar to bud but with less flavor. They tried but still not as much flavor as Bud and that is saying a lot.
Brettsky06 (92) - Manitoba, CANADA - MAY 22, 2016
1.7 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
Tastes exactly the same as a Budweiser but less calories woohoo. Pretty much just a standard tasting mass produced lager
Ttheilen (528) - USA - MAY 8, 2016
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
I do not wax on poetically about beer but I do know the quality of a beer once tasted. This review is not about my tastes but reinforces the numbers, which are arbitrary.
BeerRenter76 (668) - Texas, USA - MAR 19, 2016
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Originally rated on 6/16/08. I was out at my towns annual summer celebration and my choices were the select, budweiser, bud light, and miller lite. So when faced with two evils always select the one you never tried. First of all i was gouged on the price but it was hotter than hell, oh well. it went down smooth, not much flavor, watery, standard A.B. mass produced beer. With that said it was better than the other choices if only for the alcohol content.
ordybill (1234) - Douglasville, Georgia, USA - DEC 19, 2015
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Poured from a 12 OZ bottle into a pint glass. The appearance is a clear light yellow color with a thin white head. The aroma is of sweet grain and corn. The taste is grain with some malt, a little watery. Overall, an average beer.
theisti (3766) - Kansas, USA - AUG 3, 2015
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
12 oz twist off bottle someone left behind at a party I had earlier in the summer. 12APR15 born on date. The pour is a clear pale golden with a quickly falling white head. The aroma is sweet malt, some honey, all pretty faint. As the beer warmed, some grain. The taste is generically sweet tasting malt, clean through to the finish. The palate is light to thin bodied with soft carbonation, which was softer and easier to drink than Bud Light or Bud. The aftertaste is bit dirty sweet after it warmed.
jsmanigold (127) - Texas, USA - JUL 23, 2015
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
A darker version of Budweiser, but doesn’t taste much better. This just goes into the pile of other Budweiser products I didn’t care for.
GreatDane1632 (1165) - North Dakota, USA - MAY 15, 2015
0.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
A mass produced light lager with perhaps a dash more of some dark crystal malt to make it "different" than the others?
Art (2999) - Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA - APR 20, 2015
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Crappy beer available at the golf course. Pretty much has no color flavor or aroma. Slightly grainy aftertaste. Really not much there.
Jabah (345) - Winter Park, Florida, USA - APR 15, 2015
1.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
This is a watered down version of bud, sort of reminds me of Michelob Ultra or Bud Light. I actually like this a bit better than regular bud because the taste isn’t as strong so somewhat less skunky. The aroma is still semi-skunky, and the appearance is very thin and weak. Looks like pee, a very pale golden-yellow. The flavor is very minimal, mostly water and grain. Not the worst cheap lawnmower beer around.