sykelpumpe (3) - NORTHERN IRELAND - FEB 17, 2003 does not count
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
How I ended up buying this TWICE is beyond me.
I really, really, really hate cheap rice/corn beers.
FedForester (14) - Sisters, Oregon, USA - FEB 15, 2003
0.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
Like slightly sweet water. Very light color, mild barely noticeable taste. Could use a few hops.
JK (5809) - St. Louis Park, Minnesota, USA - FEB 14, 2003
0.8 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
UPDATED: MAY 12, 2003 Yellow. A little more "beer" taste than lots of other American macros, but there is something unwholesome and troubling about an American beer made from rice. I wouldn't even call it a cheap beer. A lower price would excuse the poor quality.
Billyaustin (28) - Austin, Texas, USA - FEB 14, 2003
3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 16/20
King of the Cheap Beers!!! no doubt about it. Has a heavier note than other domestic cheapo's, with a taste I've grown to appreciate. Pretty good flavor and not too much carbonation.
Incarpathia (21) - Edmonds, Washington, USA - FEB 14, 2003
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
By far, the one beer in the world I will not drink! I'd rather have Miller High Life Ice before this garbage! Gives American beers a bad name, the world over.
Brodie (540) - Boone, North Carolina, USA - FEB 11, 2003
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Green apples (acetylaldehyde) in the aroma, which is considered to be a major flaw in every other style. Apart from the apparent ass flavor, there is some slight sweetness, slight fruit, and corn. The one thing that makes me embarrassed to be an American is that this is our most popular beer.
desurfer (1290) - Melbourne, Florida, USA - FEB 11, 2003
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
I think WabashMan stated the facts perfectly. This is nothing to write home about, but at least it has a little more taste than its light brother.
WabashMan (1024) - Noblesville, Indiana, USA - FEB 10, 2003
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Well, it's better than Bud Light, if that says anything...then again, it doesn't say anything.
Headmint (5) - Rapid City, South Dakota, USA - FEB 10, 2003 does not count
0.8 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
The staple beer of college students and the financially challenged around here. Poured in a mug, it almost looks like real beer, but the chemical flavor says "mass-produced". Watery, tasteless and uninteresting. Drink quickly to get the alcohol effect working and dull the edges of the beer itself or of a too light wallet. If they spent the billions on producing a high quality beer instead of the advertising they do spend it on, they'd probably sell about the same amount. Either way, in the end, like the beer itself, it's a wash.
pwyman (71) - Hubert, North Carolina, USA - FEB 9, 2003
1.2 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Just the average Anhauser Busch product. Flavor leaves a lot to be desired. If it wasn't for the advertising it wouldn't sell.