chunknuts (51) - Watertown, New York, USA - SEP 22, 2002
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
thsi is terrible very disappointes w/anheuser-busch on this product. they need to start taking cues form the coors family.
vwsteggie (684) - Paxton, Massachusetts, USA - SEP 22, 2002
1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
UPDATED: JAN 29, 2003 Has a light yellow color and little smell. Taste is smooth, but watery, Shlitz is better. It has an interesting history if you catch it on the history channel.
Perdue46 (68) - USA - SEP 21, 2002
3.8 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 16/20
This happens to be my beer of choice when I am out at the local bars. Unfortunately most bars do not have keystone on tap and I feel budweiser is a suitable replacement.
morty99 (371) - Maryland, USA - SEP 21, 2002
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Volgon (2763) - Manchester, New Hampshire, USA - SEP 20, 2002
0.8 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
UPDATED: JAN 7, 2004 Re-rate 5/8/02: Born on date 5/8/02, that's right I drank a bottle on the day that it was bottled. It sure changed my opinion. The little nasty cardboard/skunk flavor that often is present in a two-month old Bud is nowhere to be found. Even the rice characteristic was better. I bet that there isn't more than 20,000 beers on the planet better than this. First rating: It's crap. It's hard to do worse. If you just want to get messed up, get a big ABV 40OZ malt liquor and go nuts, but don't drink this!
Radek Kliber (7086) - Toronto (Can) Krotoszyn (Pol), POLAND - SEP 20, 2002
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
UPDATED: DEC 22, 2008 I just had today at my friend b-day. They Bottle 341 ml, Appearance: very pale, one of the lightest brews I had in long time. Light fizzy top with frisk carbonation.1+ Aroma: very light grainy, grassy notes with light sourness. 3- Flavor/Palate: medium light bodied. Slightly more character than you will see in average macro pale lager. Sweet biscuit feel with shallow ending. Thin hop scent on top.
AleConnoisseur (29) - Houghton, Michigan, USA - SEP 20, 2002
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
This beer is better than most in the same price range, how ever this certainly is not a great beer.
Valheru (17) - CZECH REPUBLIC - SEP 17, 2002
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
The only thing good about this beer is its name... but check out Budweiser Budvar to understand what the beer of this name SHOULD taste.
beerguy101 (5355) - Newark, California, USA - SEP 16, 2002
1.2 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
Bud is Bud. It IS an amazing fact that they can brew so much of this stuff and it always tastes the same. Lots of better beers and lots of beers that are worse.
Lt gold color, large head. Lt flavor, no maltyness, some hoppyness. Pilsner Style beer, but very light flavor. Neutral mouthfeel, some hoppyness on tongue. Finish is crisp and clean. Aftertaste is neutral, slightly bitter.
hayden1215 (319) - Ohio, USA - SEP 16, 2002
0.6 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
One crappy beer.
I can’t believe 1 in 5 beers sold in the US is this crap. It’s not even that cheap. I guess your paying for the advertising not the beer.