RateBeer
overall
0
3
style

bottled
common

on tap
common

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 3993   WEIGHTED AVG: 1.46/5   EST. CALORIES: 150   ABV: 5%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Brewed and sold since 1876, "The King of Beers" is the largest-selling beer in the world. Budweiser has been the world’s best-selling beer since 1957, and is distributed in more than 70 countries. Budweiser leads the U.S. Premium beer category, outselling all other domestic premium beers combined. In fact, one in almost every five beers sold in the United States today is a Budweiser.
"We know of no brand produced by any other brewer which costs so much to brew and age. Our exclusive Beechwood Aging produces a taste, a smoothness and a drinkability you will find in no other beer at any price."
"Brewed with 100% natural ingredients. We use only the finest hops, barley malt, rice, yeast and water. We craft and age Budweiser using time-honoured brewing methods."


1.1
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 4/20
chunknuts (51) - Watertown, New York, USA - SEP 22, 2002
thsi is terrible very disappointes w/anheuser-busch on this product. they need to start taking cues form the coors family.

1
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 5/20
vwsteggie (684) - Paxton, Massachusetts, USA - SEP 22, 2002
UPDATED: JAN 29, 2003 Has a light yellow color and little smell. Taste is smooth, but watery, Shlitz is better. It has an interesting history if you catch it on the history channel.

3.8
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 9/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 16/20
Perdue46 (68) - USA - SEP 21, 2002
This happens to be my beer of choice when I am out at the local bars. Unfortunately most bars do not have keystone on tap and I feel budweiser is a suitable replacement.

1.7
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 6/20
morty99 (371) - Maryland, USA - SEP 21, 2002

0.8
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 3/20
Volgon (2763) - Manchester, New Hampshire, USA - SEP 20, 2002
UPDATED: JAN 7, 2004 Re-rate 5/8/02: Born on date 5/8/02, that's right I drank a bottle on the day that it was bottled. It sure changed my opinion. The little nasty cardboard/skunk flavor that often is present in a two-month old Bud is nowhere to be found. Even the rice characteristic was better. I bet that there isn't more than 20,000 beers on the planet better than this. First rating: It's crap. It's hard to do worse. If you just want to get messed up, get a big ABV 40OZ malt liquor and go nuts, but don't drink this!

1.6
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 6/20
Radek Kliber (7086) - Toronto (Can) Krotoszyn (Pol), POLAND - SEP 20, 2002
UPDATED: DEC 22, 2008 I just had today at my friend b-day. They Bottle 341 ml, Appearance: very pale, one of the lightest brews I had in long time. Light fizzy top with frisk carbonation.1+ Aroma: very light grainy, grassy notes with light sourness. 3- Flavor/Palate: medium light bodied. Slightly more character than you will see in average macro pale lager. Sweet biscuit feel with shallow ending. Thin hop scent on top.

1.4
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 6/20
AleConnoisseur (29) - Houghton, Michigan, USA - SEP 20, 2002
This beer is better than most in the same price range, how ever this certainly is not a great beer.

0.5
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
Valheru (17) - CZECH REPUBLIC - SEP 17, 2002
The only thing good about this beer is its name... but check out Budweiser Budvar to understand what the beer of this name SHOULD taste.

1.2
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 5/20
beerguy101 (5355) - Newark, California, USA - SEP 16, 2002
Bud is Bud. It IS an amazing fact that they can brew so much of this stuff and it always tastes the same. Lots of better beers and lots of beers that are worse. Lt gold color, large head. Lt flavor, no maltyness, some hoppyness. Pilsner Style beer, but very light flavor. Neutral mouthfeel, some hoppyness on tongue. Finish is crisp and clean. Aftertaste is neutral, slightly bitter.

0.6
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 2/20
hayden1215 (319) - Ohio, USA - SEP 16, 2002
One crappy beer. I can’t believe 1 in 5 beers sold in the US is this crap. It’s not even that cheap. I guess your paying for the advertising not the beer.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 333 334 335  336  337 338 339 » 400


Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2016,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50