JBWalters3 (26) - USA - SEP 24, 2002
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
not impressive. I will never drink this again unless I am broke as a two dollar hooker in 1831. And no other beer is available
thebaron99 (110) - Royston Park SA, AUSTRALIA - SEP 23, 2002
2 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Insipid lightly fruited catpee. Pro’s: Can drink 24 easily. Con’s: You’ll regret it like I did, Duhhh..
chunknuts (51) - Watertown, New York, USA - SEP 22, 2002
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
thsi is terrible very disappointes w/anheuser-busch on this product. they need to start taking cues form the coors family.
vwsteggie (684) - Paxton, Massachusetts, USA - SEP 22, 2002
1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
UPDATED: JAN 29, 2003 Has a light yellow color and little smell. Taste is smooth, but watery, Shlitz is better. It has an interesting history if you catch it on the history channel.
Perdue46 (68) - USA - SEP 21, 2002
3.8 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 16/20
This happens to be my beer of choice when I am out at the local bars. Unfortunately most bars do not have keystone on tap and I feel budweiser is a suitable replacement.
morty99 (371) - Maryland, USA - SEP 21, 2002
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Volgon (2763) - Manchester, New Hampshire, USA - SEP 20, 2002
0.8 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
UPDATED: JAN 7, 2004 Re-rate 5/8/02: Born on date 5/8/02, that's right I drank a bottle on the day that it was bottled. It sure changed my opinion. The little nasty cardboard/skunk flavor that often is present in a two-month old Bud is nowhere to be found. Even the rice characteristic was better. I bet that there isn't more than 20,000 beers on the planet better than this. First rating: It's crap. It's hard to do worse. If you just want to get messed up, get a big ABV 40OZ malt liquor and go nuts, but don't drink this!
Radek Kliber (7165) - Toronto (Can) Krotoszyn (Pol), POLAND - SEP 20, 2002
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
UPDATED: DEC 22, 2008 I just had today at my friend b-day. They Bottle 341 ml, Appearance: very pale, one of the lightest brews I had in long time. Light fizzy top with frisk carbonation.1+ Aroma: very light grainy, grassy notes with light sourness. 3- Flavor/Palate: medium light bodied. Slightly more character than you will see in average macro pale lager. Sweet biscuit feel with shallow ending. Thin hop scent on top.
AleConnoisseur (29) - Houghton, Michigan, USA - SEP 20, 2002
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
This beer is better than most in the same price range, how ever this certainly is not a great beer.
Valheru (17) - CZECH REPUBLIC - SEP 17, 2002
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
The only thing good about this beer is its name... but check out Budweiser Budvar to understand what the beer of this name SHOULD taste.