PRUCK (19) - CHICAGO, Illinois, USA - FEB 2, 2011
3.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 20/20
This shit is BEECHWOOD AGED. Too many people forget that some beer is MADE FOR swilling. They forget that they need to review what this beer IS, as opposed to what it IS NOT. Completely inoffensive!!! Crisp! Tons of small, tongue and throat massaging bubbles! Mild ricey flavor with a boost of organic heritage maize! No hangover regardless of how many you drink (pbr and high life cannot make this claim.) This crap is the KING OF BEERS for a reason! LONG LIVE THE KING!!!
Kobracai (96) - FINLAND - JUL 23, 2016
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Pale yellow lager and weak foam. Taste is a lot of water and soda. Not that tastefull. Works after cutting the lawn. But thats about it.
Tjomleif (50) - NORWAY - JUL 22, 2016
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
Best water in town. Such a pitty with the headache tough. No really, never liked this one.
alexmate (31) - South Yorkshire, ENGLAND - JUL 20, 2016
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
An OK lager. The way I would describe it is being sapid, and I don’t mean sapid as in pleasant I mean it tastes like tree sap. A floral, acacia taste. The UK stuff is very plain and watery. The UK brew also suffers a lower ABV at 4.3% or 4.7% depending on the version. It’s OK on a hot day, but there are better options.
evannell (628) - Kraków, POLAND - JUL 19, 2016
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Piwo buja się charakterem gdzieś między tymi "najczystszymi" koncerniakami. Nie jest jakieś tam złe. Po prostu nieciekawe.
NavyFireRN (6) - - JUL 18, 2016 does not count
4.3 AROMA 9/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 16/20
via Beer Buddy for iPhone
hamilton_w (210) - - JUL 16, 2016
1.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Some nice fresh aroma at the first touch. Very pale color, minimal head. Average lager taste. Not too thin, some sweet aftertaste.
Skarecrow (97) - North Shore, Auckland, NEW ZEALAND - JUL 16, 2016
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
UPDATED: JUL 19, 2016 355ml bottle BB 26/10/2016
Well it does say "beer" on the label......
Grainy, floral aroma with sulfur and cardboard notes.
Pours VERY pale straw with an OK head.
The taste ?
Slight bitterness followed by graininess and wet cardboard.
OK if you’re thirsty I guess.
rob19a (13) - - JUL 10, 2016
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
It's bud, it's fine. Smashed through a 300ml with an Indian. Aftertaste of chemicals and straw. Burps guaranteed.
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
Luneylane (17) - Taipei City, TAIWAN - JUL 6, 2016
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
I don’t like the taste of this, and I don’t see what rice contributes to the overall flavour. However, the label looks good, and the dispute between the company and Budvar makes an interesting bit of beer history. In Taipei I will always choose a locally brewed beer over this one.
NothingButBeer (1) - AUSTRALIA - JUN 25, 2016 does not count
3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
She’s not a bad drop to be honest. Pours with minimal head and poor appearance. Taste redeems the downfalls.