DYCSoccer17 (3305) - Woodland, California, USA - NOV 6, 2001
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
UPDATED: JAN 17, 2006 Bad Bad beer, with a skunky taste. The only way I can handle this beer is if it’s ice cold, if its any less than cold, it’s absolutely disgusting. Very overhyped redneck beer(4/3/3/2/3/1.5).--- needed Re-rate (1/17/06)----- inscribed with the following ditty: "Hops are the spice of beer. At Budweiser, we use only the finest whole hop flowers available. We hand select many varieties from the world’s best hop-growing radions, including our own farms in Idahol and Bavaria. Selecting and brewing hops this way is more expensive, but it produces the distinctive taste that only belongs to Budweiser". Boy oh boy, this is gonna be one hoppy IPA! This is a 2005 Vintage BTW. Aroma is of vegetables, sour and corn-like. The hops mentioned on the label were not dtected at all in the aroma. Transparent pale yellow color with a false, artifical white head that is quickly dissipating. Grainy, cereal-like with hints of corn and other adjuncts. Harsh in the finish and I still don’t detect any of these hops. Overly and falsely carbonated. Doesn’t Saddam Hussein claim that he’s King of Iraq? I think he has more merit with that declaration than Budweiser does with declaring themselves the King of Beers.
gbeerrater (21) - Louisiana, USA - AUG 17, 2014
0.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
If rescued from a desert survival situation would drink over urine to survive other wise would not open my wallet for this
Price wise at $5.99 a six pack ,the national suggested price in bottles, Budweiser leaves one to consider a number of options at the same price range sold at Trader Joes.
The company idea was to be able to taste a Budweiser at any one of their breweries and have the same exact product, meeting exact brewing standards however a St Louis bud actually tastes far better than one from Mandeville LA and both different than a Fairfield CA product which tasted like it was made from the local grown corn.
Seen used as a relatively cheap bar back for boil maker shots without to much complaint as the well booze is usually just that, well booze with a rubbing alcohol taste no beer can hide so why bother wasting good beer.
Anheiser Bush also seems to have a fascination developing cheap alcoholic beverages with Budweiser as a base like Budweiser Clamato
chelada which doubles as a emergency ipecac syrup to induce vomiting.
Ill stop here, bud desrves a 0 as rating as its hard to call this anything more than a yellow alcoholic watery substance.
YantarCoast (37) - Moscow, RUSSIA - AUG 13, 2014
1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
500ml bottle, brewed in the Moscow Region under license by SUN InBev. Labelled as "Bud". Pours a piss yellow colour with no head. Very little aroma. Tastes of water and rice. Nothing to see here. Beerwater.
dado93 (137) - ITALY - AUG 13, 2014
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
Blonde/golden color with fine head, classic commercial blonde beer (better than many other commercial product) light sweet taste, good carbonation and light body...Light hop/malt aftertaste...
g_georgiou (185) - CYPRUS - AUG 12, 2014
1.7 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
Clear yellow body, very thin white head. Very weak aroma. I think I can smell some barley. Sweet with just a touch of fizz. A good thirst quencher if water is not available. Tastes almost the same too. It’s the kind of beer you can drink a lot of. Not heavy at all.
rollsrace (21) - - AUG 9, 2014
0.9 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
This would be the king of beers if all other beers was actually water. It doesn’t taste bad for what little taste there is
hyacinthus (11) - CZECH REPUBLIC - AUG 8, 2014
0.9 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Pale Water. No aroma, poor head, almost no taste - extremely watery. No bitterness. Only colour is acceptable, for a corporate lager that is.
PeterFria (16) - - AUG 6, 2014
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 7/20
Horrible but large publicities on all American sport events won’t change my mind! I prefer drink juice is no other beer available
Bork (126) - Rockmart, Georgia, USA - AUG 1, 2014
1.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Essentially flavorless and watery beer with some cereal sweetness. Aftertaste is of water and wet rag. Best ice cold straight from the bottle.
BMA (166) - Stockholm, SWEDEN - JUL 30, 2014
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
In a bottle all beers look good but the aroma experience is not impressive. But that’s the way they do it. Small taste. Waterish. Boring.
belgis (127) - LATVIA - JUL 29, 2014
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Wow,this color is pale. Some yeasty aroma,but not much. Thin in taste watery. Still refreshing.