Budweiser

Oh, well... Can, bought @ Netto, Kolding.
Pours very pale golden with a small, fizzy, frothy, white head. Low duration. Aroma is sweet, some maize and brewing cereal. Very watery palate, lowish carbonation. Flavour is practically non-existent, some sweetness. No hops. Well, it’s not excactly ’bad’, it is just so poor, that nothing there anymore.

I had this as part of a pie and beer promotion at the Super League Grand Final at Old Trafford last night, it’s not as bad as I remember it and it has quite a crisp taste

This is Bart’s Beer bart@gsridgway.com . Aroma is not fantastic.. the appearance is because I am here to get drunk. Pour is slighlty darker than urine. You drink Budweiser to get drunk there is not a lot of taste to budweiser - not an enjoyable taste to this beer but it is tollerable. It is not about enjoyable taste, there is only one goal and that is the buzz or to get drunk. Here is the deal and here is the overall view.. there is nothing wrong with the beer. it is not a bad beer it is just a Beer. Personaly Bart would rather drink a good beer but he cant afford it. Good times -THis is a poor man’s good time.

They don’t call it the king for nothing. Like it or not Bud is a staple for so many events that other more interesting beers can not compete. You can’t play pong with lambics. Getting hotties wasted doesn’t work with porters, he’s the king for a reason, everyone else is merely a subject in the kingdom

This is a good cheap beer that has a refreshing taste to it but not a strong one. Tastes like it is watered down and is only sorta good when it is really cold.