rm0312 (36) - Idaho, USA - MAR 12, 2007
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Tastes like an old book you’ve found in the attic after a decade or so - musty and old. I’m sorry, but if this is the King of beers, we’re in serious need of a government over-throw.
gegwilson (2119) - North Yorkshire, ENGLAND - AUG 3, 2015
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Drank straight from the bottle at the Bansdale darts tournament - a night when I should have taken more beer. Instead I had to resort to drinking this. Truly an awful beer, even for a lager. The taste is fizzy water with some vague and unpleasant flavours of grain, straw and metal. Dire.
Ffelipe (36) - BRAZIL - AUG 1, 2015
1.2 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Sem aroma e sem sabor, somente para refrescar e ser bebida em quantidade pois não lembra em nada boas cervejas
Ivardo (102) - NORWAY - JUL 31, 2015
3.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
Converting" from old excel scoresheet. So there is no comments on this beer.
jsmanigold (96) - Texas, USA - JUL 23, 2015
0.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Very watery with not much taste. It is my least favorite beer out of the American lagers.
szeli (63) - GERMANY - JUL 19, 2015
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Nahezu kein Aroma und Geschmack vorhanden. Goldenes Wasser mit klein wenig Malz und minimal Hopfen.
Sehr wässrig, geradezu wie mildes Sprudelwasser.
Im Geschmack etwas muffig, leicht süß, unangenehmer Hopfen.
Getrunken zu einem doppelten Cheeseburger War es zwar typisch amerikanisch. Aber lecker War es nicht
Lebo88 (143) - POLAND - JUL 18, 2015
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bottle 500 ml. Tasteless beer. Didn’t mind it that much when I drank it, but it’s no very tasty by any means.
jdjuice (453) - Kumamoto, JAPAN - JUL 17, 2015
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 5/20
If you imagine this is a light champagne, it actually looks quite pretty, with its faint yellow hue and tight carbonation. Then you remember that it’s supposed to be beer, even though it tastes like little more than seltzer with unpleasant flavoring added. The old package used to be the best thing about the beer, but they updated it to something uninspired, boring, and charmless.
alex_leit (503) - Minsk, BELARUS - JUL 13, 2015
0.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
Bottle. Clear golden golor. Aroma: malt, grain and corn. Taste: watery, malty, a bit creamy, soft and sad. Hren’.
lah0116 (2) - - JUL 11, 2015 does not count
5 AROMA 10/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 20/20
It is not a cliche if the beer taste good. It might not be the politically correct beer but Bud simply taste good.
TorbenJensen (515) - Valby, DENMARK - JUL 11, 2015
1.7 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
This is an average lager with a dense white, but rapidly diminishing foam. The aroma is limited to the hops. The flavor has a light malty character, rapidly changing to a hoppy bitterness. Quite a good average lager after all. The brewery itself calls this beer the ’King of Beers’ which in my view is a strong exaggeration. But taste is of course different.