0.9 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Does anyone actually like this stuff (can't call it beer!)? I can understand if you drink a certain beer A LOT, you might come to enjoy it but oh man is this bad! Its so bad I rather have a Canadian. Never again will I willingly let this touch my lips!
1.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 8/20
There’s nothing wrong with the taste of this beer, it’s big problem is that it doesn’t have much flavor. It is light and watery, but as far as the macro brews go, this is one of the better lagers. I would say this is a good reliable beer for the people that don’t really enjoy beer.
1.2 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Just your basic so called "premium lager"; watery, tasteless and with no defining aspects... perhaps the only redeeming factor of Budweiser over it’s similar lagers is that it is brown bottled and at least has a bottling date... for that reason I would likely pick this up over say Stella or Miller if I had to.
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
330ml bottle. Clear golden colour with small to average frothy white head. Flat typical pale lager "aroma". Taste is different from water. Next, please.
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
I can’t believe I am only just now rating Bud. Well, there isn’t much to say that others haven’t. It’s a light golden with a thin white head. I really can’t smell anything. Taste is grainy, a little grassy and just a little hoppy. Not very good at all, but then again...to all the haters...there are some REALLY bad beers out there. This one is only mediocre. Really pretty decent for working on the car, mowing the lawn, etc.
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
Leve aroma a malta. Poca espuma, muy poco persistente. Cerveza de color pajizo muy clara. Amargor casi nulo y final con tendencia seca. Suave
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
Last time I let my wifes friends pick the bar! Fizzy yellow pour with little head. Slightly more prominent in taste than aroma, but that’s hardly a win. Rice, corn water, and grass in both the aroma and the flavor. Watery mouthfeel, fizzy carbonation. My sister in law (who loves San Miguel beer) drank under half a glass before switching to Rum and Cokes.
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
King of Beers! Difficult for the head if have more than 2.
Has that little sting of a bite. Smell is of metal cereal.
Bland taste. Not a great buzz.
1.2 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
It is what it is.......king of Macro.....If faced with no other choice, I will drink as it is better than nothing.....I think?
1.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Bottle at bar. Gold color, white head. Watery taste with almost no malts or hops. Pretty terrible beer.
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
So "King of Beers" steht auf der Flasche, dieser Spruch versaut schon jetzt meine Stimmung. Wässrig, säuerlich, ganz leicht Hopfen und Reis. Einen Tick nicht so schlecht wie Miller, aber auch nicht nicht schlecht. Fazit: Das Lieblingsbier so vieler Amerikaner, wie soll man da gegen das Aufkommen von Vorurteile ankommen?
Test vom 25.4.2009, Gebinde: Glasflasche Noten: 4,2,3,3,5,2 - 2,65
|
