BStigz (23) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - OCT 31, 2002
0.8 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
"Buschhhhhhhhhh!!!" I will say they used to have some good commercials. Remember the one where the girl opens the bottle on her belt buckle and the beer comes spurting out on her stomach? That said, this is a poor man’s beer and is best suited for making bread or boiling brats. I’ll drink it if there’s nothing else available.
Habman (23) - London, Ontario, CANADA - SEP 24, 2004
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
My first exposure to this was as a young Canadian lad visiting my Floridian relatives. Since it was available cheap in gas stations, corner stores, and take out windows everywhere, it was a winner in my eyes.
Decades have passed and I have tried many a beer from around the world. It is smack in the middle of countless easy drinkin lagers designed to be served ice cold and bolted down right from the can or bottle.
Don’t think I’ve ever had one in a glass, so can’t provide the usual sensory descriptors. Tastes like you would expect. No more no less.
"Howz yer Busch"?
stevusmagnus (22) - Ohio, USA - OCT 20, 2005
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
Not sure what Bud was thinking here. Maybe this is their version of Natty Lite? Still, you’d think since this beer has the founder’s NAME on it, it would taste better than cat piss. Nope. I guess maybe he just thought it was funny.
DowntownGator (22) - Florida, USA - NOV 3, 2007
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
I would rate it lower if I could. Immitation beer at its finest, and a wonderful example of capitalism in action, that is, making the cheapest product possible and selling for highest price market will allow. Acquisition wholesale cost = 25 cents, sells for $2.50 and up at restaurants. Calling this thing beer is disrepectful to the word, and the entire concept of the tradition.
collegiatebrew (22) - Defreestville, New York, USA - MAR 8, 2002
2.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 13/20
papajijo (22) - USA - APR 28, 2002
2.8 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
a solid beer...makes me happy
BurgerBeerMan99 (21) - Cincinnati, Ohio, USA - NOV 22, 2002
1.4 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
LoRyder34 (21) - La Crosse, Wisconsin, USA - DEC 1, 2003
1.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 9/20
A decent cheap beer to have fun with. A little on the heavy side, seems to be quite filling even though it has very little flavor.
reus958 (21) - Seattle, Washington, USA - JUL 10, 2014
1.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
I hate to give simple reviews, but there isn’t much to say about this beer except "wet cardboard"
Paulynine99 (21) - East Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA - DEC 14, 2000
0.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
I was compelled to complement this beer due to its novelty as the king of shitty beer, but then I remembered how bad it really is. Beer doesnt come much worse than this, id rather take down a frosty mug of urine.