RateBeer
overall
n/a
1
style

bottled
available

on tap
unknown

Regional Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 1097   WEIGHTED AVG: 1.27/5   EST. CALORIES: 138   ABV: 4.6%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Has a smooth, refreshing taste. Busch is brewed with a blend of premium American-grown and imported hops and a combination of malt and corn to provide a pleasant balanced flavor. Since being introduced regionally in 1955, the Busch beer brand family has grown to become one of the top-selling value beer brand families. Busch also holds a noted place in Anheuser-Busch history as the first new brand after the repeal of Prohibition.


0.5
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
Prostman (1077) - Pennsylvania, USA - MAY 30, 2002
Well, this is ummm....crap...smells like a dirty bush (and you fellas know what I mean). Taste is similar...haha

0.5
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
TheOrange (479) - Kent, Ohio, USA - JUN 11, 2002
The label said ’beer’. But I would have to disagree with it. What was inside was terrible. Very watery, very carbinated.

0.5
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
swamptours (28) - Romulus, Michigan, USA - JUN 30, 2002
I used to drink this beer when I was in college because it was so cheap. Even then it was a god awful beer which would have dire effects the next day. Almost no flavor at all. Avoid!

0.5
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
TheDean (786) - MIlwaukee, Wisconsin, USA - JUL 3, 2002
My best friend had this for his first beer. He didn’t drink beer again for 3 years. Enough said

0.5
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
Pjones6738 (500) - Madison, Wisconsin, USA - JUL 14, 2002
This was my first beer. Assumed all beer tasted like this, and wouldn’t touch the stuff for a couple of years afterward. Would have to be paid to drink this again.

0.5
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
Ringo (963) - Loveland, Colorado, USA - JUL 15, 2002
One of my all-time least favorite beers. This stuff sucks in the worst way. I’d much rather have Old Milwaukee than this foul, strangely metallic tasting, weird price-segment crap. Seems to be priced for people who are too good for Old Mill or whatever, but can’t afford Bud.

0.5
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
SETANTA (582) - Bangor, Pennsylvania, USA - AUG 5, 2002
blick

0.5
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
benzim (36) - USA - AUG 16, 2002
Bad even for the price

0.5
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
Panzuriel (1952) - Westerville, Ohio, USA - AUG 17, 2002
I can’t think of a worse beer. So thin and weak. Like water that had a cheerio dissolve in it.

0.5
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 1/20
hattrick6899 (16) - USA - AUG 31, 2002
bad, bad beer. Please spend the extra few bucks to get Guinness, or at least Yuengling


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 97 98 99  100  101 102 103 » 110


Tick this beer for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2016,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50