GT2 (8526) - San Diego County, California, USA - NOV 19, 2009
1.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Can. You know this wasnít as bad as I would have originally thought. It pours a rather deep, sickly urine color with a rather dense white head that has very little retention and no lacing. Aroma is big corn, esters, formaldihyde, some vegetal notes. Big seltzer mouthfeel with a slightly creamy body. Taste is pretty much typical macro lager but has a bit more depth. At 6.7%, itís not quite a malt liquor or full ice beer, which is probably why it is overall inoffensive. Not bad. I was terrified to try it but now Iím a firm believer.
DocLock (7919) - Lower Pottsgrove, Pennsylvania, USA - APR 9, 2004
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Just Busch with the fictitious "ice filtering" procedure. Not worth drinking at any temperature.
shrubber85 (7804) - Greenville, Indiana, USA - JUN 16, 2007
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
Can. Sour, old vegetable malt aroma. Medium yellow with small head. Primarily a metallic bitterness with light sour malt flavor. Drinkable but just barely.
DuffMan (6901) - the land of bitumen, beef & beer, Alberta, CANADA - SEP 24, 2007
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Another supercan purchase to sip while strolling the Vegas Strip, another supercan discard after about 10 sips. "Bland" is being complimentary of this featureless macro,
phaleslu (6616) - Cincinnati, Ohio, USA - JUL 13, 2009
0.9 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
For the price, highest alcohol content in class. Therefore, it achieves exactly what it is meant to do. Like every other íIceí beer, this doesnít go down as smooth as other cheapies.
Radek Kliber (6519) - Toronto (Can) Krotoszyn (Pol), POLAND - MAR 30, 2002
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Not much difference btw. Ice or normal Bush . Not much of anything , alco-sweet ... Small head , pale ... Slightly toxic :)... Remember NATURAL CARBONATION !!!
arminjewell (6294) - Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA - JAN 8, 2010
0.7 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
Well, it has a relatively high alcohol content, and thatís the only upside. A horrid mess of metal and slight hay and cereal.
drowland (6100) - Valdosta, Georgia, USA - AUG 15, 2009
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Oh my word... Iím not a big fan of ice beers, but this is far from one of the best (though thatís like picking the shiniest turd).
SudsMcDuff (5894) - .....Manchester United.........., Texas, USA - NOV 14, 2006
2.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Sampled from a 16 ounce can, it doesnít have an body what so ever and its taste is seriously lacking, it does have a good abv and is quite cheap, so you decide. ......rerate...i guess....i really thought i hadnít had this before but that shows ya, the mind starts to wonder after 500+ beers....nice smell really,doesnít smell cheap at all....good good lacing to ,wow, looks and smells the part so far...and the taste is of corn flakes, i have underestimated this beer,...hey its still in the lower ranks of pale lagers but this one isnít that digusting so....(scores changed accordingly)
PorterPounder (5607) - Tallahassee, Florida, USA - JUN 15, 2013
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Soddy-Daisy, Tn. - some random convenience store - 24 oz. can. Light golden pour, pithy white head. Wet paper bag aroma with some grainy accents. Non-descript cheap lager flavor with some corniness, a hint of soggy cereal and some slight boozy notes. Very dry mouthfeel. Palatable.